Why dont Boxers ever settle fight purses by who wins?

[ballgamessuck]

It's because do something like that is not a good "buissness" decision. No other way I can explain it.

It is a great idea, no more posturing and arguing "I brought this many PPV"s against this fighter" and the opponent says "Yes, but brought that many PPV"s against another fighter. If you want to biggest peice of the pie, shut your mouth, get in the ring, and take it from the other man. I believe that is how Bhop and Jones did it in there fight.

[Gino Ros]

Sounds to me like the sport would do better without a fighter who is too popular to take a 60% win,or a 40% loss,no??

do you feel oscar dlh would take a chance fighting hopkins if he was going to get the smaller payday?

i dont even think manny would fight floyd with those terms.

why would manny give margarito or clotty 40% with a chance of giving him 60%. makes no sense.

[Bushbaby]

do you feel oscar dlh would take a chance fighting hopkins if he was going to get the smaller payday?

i dont even think manny would fight floyd with those terms.

why would manny give margarito or clotty 40% with a chance of giving him 60%. makes no sense.

Obviously it wouldn't apply to Margarito or Clottey,but with Floyd Pacman it definately applies!!

[Drunk Punch]

Because most times it aint up to the boxer. Too many other people need to get paid.