what do you think of BS P4P ranking?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Russian Crushin
    atheist with a gun
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 33788
    • 1,472
    • 836
    • 46,625

    #21
    Originally posted by Mr. Blobby
    So his early start to his pro career and lack of experience had nothing to do with his losses?
    No it did. But we were comparing Pacs start at 106 and Floyds at 131.

    Plus those loses arent what defines Pac, it is his wins

    Comment

    • Rick Grimes
      The Walking Dead
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 5517
      • 253
      • 18
      • 517

      #22
      Originally posted by yevskiy426
      No it did. But we were comparing Pacs start at 106 and Floyds at 131.

      Plus those loses arent what defines Pac, it is his wins
      Yep and i'm saying Floyd could have made that weight if he turned pro at the same age, so if Pacquiao gets credit for turning pro at an earlier age then he should get discredit for losing.

      Comment

      • paniki
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 75
        • 9
        • 16
        • 6,199

        #23
        blah blah blah.... read the first post again

        Comment

        • bojangles1987
          bo jungle
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 41118
          • 1,326
          • 357
          • 63,028

          #24
          Sick of people acting like a catchweight is some horrible thing no one ever does.

          Lots of catchweight title fights have happened. Pacquiao-Cotto was no horrible catchweight, and it was the only catchweight fight Pac has ever fought.

          But somehow that equals Pacquiao being some catchweight monster.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP