what do you think of BS P4P ranking?

[paniki]

They were around the same size at the same age, Mayweather was smart and polished his skills before turning pro.

let me clear this out, im talking about professional boxing: standard gloves, 3 minute 12 round max bout, NO HEAD GEAR.

my contention is pac started his pro career at 105 lbs and will be fighting at 151 lbs (difference of 46 lbs), his heaviest.
gayweather started his pro career at 130 lbs and his heaviest was at 154 lbs (difference of 24 lbs), his heaviest

if one of the justifications why floyd is #1 p4p, as per boxingscene, is that he did not fight at catchweights, then i dont buy that. they should edit that part coz it's basically nonsense.

[Russian Crushin]

AND? You was trying to make out that Pacquiao was much smaller when he wasn't, if Mayweather chose to start his pro career at the same age as Pac he would have moved up the same amount of weight.

Floyd First fight---131

Pac First fight----106

^^^^^that says it all

[Rick Grimes]

Floyd First fight---131

Pac First fight----106

^^^^^that says it all

Mayweather 0 losses
Pacquiao 3 losses and a draw

That says it all

[paniki]

i was trying to make a point that pac experienced more adversity at an early age coz he did not fight with pillows for gloves, headgears, etc.

and by the way this is about the BS p4p ranking. the last time i checked, amateur career is not included.

[paniki]

Mayweather 0 losses
Pacquiao 3 losses and a draw

That says it all

am i reading a post from a 3d grader? LOL

AGAIN, the reason why i posted this thread is because BS said floyd is number 1 coz one of the reasons is that he did not ask for catchweight.

since when did i contend their record? LOL

go look for the right thread for your post, little girl

[Russian Crushin]

Mayweather 0 losses
Pacquiao 3 losses and a draw

That says it all

Calzaghe 46-0
Floyd 41-0

So Calzaghe>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Floyd

That must be true by your logic

[Rick Grimes]

am i reading a post from a 3d grader? LOL

AGAIN, the reason why i posted this thread is because BS said floyd is number 1 coz one of the reasons is that he did not ask for catchweight.

since when did i contend their record? LOL

go look for the right thread for your post, little girl

You was trying to use Pacquiaos move up in weight as a reason he should be number one, it's plain as day to see. If you are going to take into account his move up in weight you should also take into account his losses.

[mathed]

Calzaghe 46-0
Floyd 41-0

So Calzaghe>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Floyd

That must be true by your logic

lol, true......Calzaghe is the man!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Russian Crushin]

You was trying to use Pacquiaos move up in weight as a reason he should be number one, it's plain as day to see. If you are going to take into account his move up in weight you should also take into account his losses.

Haha

Your trying to make a connection with 2 completely unrelated things

[Rick Grimes]

Haha

Your trying to make a connection with 2 completely unrelated things

So his early start to his pro career and lack of experience had nothing to do with his losses?