Sounds like you'd call anyone saying anything negative about Floyd biased, but you're just too biased and particular against Filipinos.
Yet I still have too hear any intelligent argument coming from you defending Floyd against what I said. You're doing nothing but whining right now.
umm as i said u just bashed some of floyds opponents which can easily be applied when talking bout pacquiaos resume. so i dont count those as believable arguments from you. and dont play ****** DD seriosuly, you have no idea why i say that phillipinos are biased when talking bout pacquiao ? haha
im not ! thats why i leave that to the professionals ! but saying that its a clear robbery is insane.
It's not insane if it's true.
Those professionals you speak so highly of have been making some of the biggest blunders judging fights that it's become a big issue. That's one of the major reasons Boxing's been taking a hit in mainstream sports. And who says you have to be a pro to be able to judge a fight correctly? Frankly for a long time fan, that's just naive thinking.
With the length of time you've been bragging being an afficionado, you had to have at some point been able to form your own opinion about fights, exclusive and independent of what these professional judges have to say at the final bell, or else you've been nothing but a mindless fanboy all the years you've been following the sport.
There is a lot of biased posters on here (I consider myself one). So lets us see what they experts have to say....the ones who job is to cover the sport. It's damn near unanimous amongst them that Manny has achieved more, so that's should really end this discussion.
People say Manny has fooled a lot of people but I don't see that. How can you fool so many experts....most of them who have been following the sport for decades and have covered legends like Ali, Robinson and others? You guys act like these are writers who are new to the sport or something.
^^^^^ I say this because those same guys have been following boxing long enough to see who are the fraud fighters and who are the legit fighters. If Manny was any of that, then the experts would have pointed it out a long time ago.
Floyd has never been beat, and before you start saying his fights were all cherry picked against weak opponents then you should also be criticizing Pac for the same thing because both pac and floyd came up from lower weight classes. difference being Floyd never made catch weight fights for titles. Floyd wins this argument in the long run, and his legacy will be one boxing will remember most. Pac will shine in the same light but FLoyd will go down as the best.
FMJ: 131 total Fights
3 Golden glove championships as an Amatauer
Bronze medalist in the 1996 olympic games
5 Titles in 6 different weight classes
Ring Magazine fighter of the year
Recognized P4P best fighter
Highest Paid Fighter in Boxing right now (forbes.com)
Pac: 120 total fights
6 Titles in 7 weight classes
recognized P4P best fighter
Okay, im a fan of both but how has PAC done more in boxing?
What has Amateur rankings got to do with what happens in the pro's ?.
The only noticible accomplishment that seperates these two is FOTD, that's it. Then again Floyd does have a more accomplished ameteur background than PAC, and that's still considered boxing.
Comment