Yes, we know Froch won a decision over Pascal on Froch's home-turf. But you can also bring up cases that you feel Pascal feels more comfortable at 175.
Who do you consider the better overall fighter Pascal or Froch?
Collapse
-
Who do you consider the better overall fighter Pascal or Froch?
13Pascal69.23%9Froch30.77%4Tags: None -
Right now you have to say Pascal, the dude is younger and still improving, Froch is 6 years older and on the downward slide of the peak -
Pascal is really a natural LHW, he's young and since those two Diaconu wars he has improved a lot... so i say Pascal...Comment
-
-
froch and he already beat pascal. he's in better shape, has more power, solid chin, more heart and has a fine ass biitch that make me stubby lil **** hard.
pascal is french canadian.
enuff said.Comment
-
:gay:
C'est pas un ostie d'plein de marde comme toé qui vas m'faire chier, décolisse !
Last edited by Megamasterking; 08-20-2010, 02:01 AM.Comment
-
i wasnt really bashing french canadians. i like them. i always wish i had a body and could fight like george st pierre. but i am just a fat pansy.
i just think british have more better fighters, like americans have more better fighters than the british. it's not that there actually better, they just have more fighters who are great. it's in the history books. american history books, but that doesnt really matter.
usa, usa, usa!
Comment
-
I'd still back Froch in a rematch, but Pascal is younger and has improved since the their war in 08, whereas Froch is pretty much in his prime and is on a decline through the wars he has been in.....and Abraham is still yet to come.
Since Pascal, Froch has fought Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler and now Abraham.
Pascal has Diacanu x2 and Dawson.
Froch has fought elite after elite....and it's taking a toll on him and his body....both are warriors.Comment
Comment