Comments Thread For: Erik Morales Questions Pacquiao's Drug Test Stance

[Too_Slick]

morales is just mad pacquiao destroyed him, and pac does get tested before and after every fight, morales is washed up and should find a job at taco bell before he gets seriously hurt

fck you Morales is awsome, hes the only person that can say he went toe to toe in the SOUTHPAW position with Pac and came out unko'd and alive, u know what happens when other opponnts tried it, just look at ur avi.

[GoogleMe]

I doubt it since Morales made Pacquiao his son even though he was already past his prime.

Word, word and word!

[fabie]

Floyd doesn't set the protocol of the USADA. The USADA sets the protocol for the USADA. Floyd just another athlete, dude doesn't have that kind of power to control HOW an agency does their drug testing. Let's be clear here.

For some reason patards think floyd created the USADA.

Quit wasting your time, man. That's like talking to a brick wall. Those guys are too hardheaded for their own good.

"Even Floyd never agreed to have Random Blood testing in his previous fight; that 19 days blood test prior to his fight against Mosley wasn't Random!"


You *******s always use that as some so-called Argument.Alot of you are so dum that ya`ll don`t realize that Floyd and Mosley was`nt aware if their was gonna be a cutoff date which is why its called Random.


The test giver can decide iF there`s gonna be a cutoff date or not.sOMETIMES THERE IS SOMETIMES THEIR IS`NT,REGARDLESS THE ATHLETES BEING TEST IS`NT OLD.

It is very clear that the USADA enforces their own policies but the main issue is that the USADA isn't obliged nor it isn't their role to monitor the sport of boxing unless authorized by the NSAC.

The real issue is the contingency and grounds for calling out such drug testing out of this air just because of "speculation" or "fear" of the other.

It cannot be used by one party to check on the other without due grounds/proofs or evidence. It is much like a preliminary hearing in courts to determine the validity of such furtherance of cases and the charges.

Otherwise anybody can cry "foul" and wasting time, effort and money inorder to satisfy their agenda whether for the cause of the sport or just to aggravate an issue.

One's pleas or demands isn't necessarily viewed as an "authority". One can request only. Such as catchweights...they are mutually agreed upon and viewed as a contract. One can always disagree without the obligation or fear of repercussions because it isn't a RULE or POLICY governed by the Nevada Sports and Athletic Commission.

Both sides have issues. But both can meet in the middle.

[IMDAZED]

It is very clear that the USADA enforces their own policies but the main issue is that the USADA isn't obliged nor it isn't their role to monitor the sport of boxing unless authorized by the NSAC.

The real issue is the contingency and grounds for calling out such drug testing out of this air just because of "speculation" or "fear" of the other.

It cannot be used by one party to check on the other without due grounds/proofs or evidence. It is much like a preliminary hearing in courts to determine the validity of such furtherance of cases and the charges.

Otherwise anybody can cry "foul" and wasting time, effort and money inorder to satisfy their agenda whether for the cause of the sport or just to aggravate an issue.

One's pleas or demands isn't necessarily viewed as an "authority". One can request only. Such as catchweights...they are mutually agreed upon and viewed as a contract. One can always disagree without the obligation or fear of repercussions because it isn't a RULE or POLICY governed by the Nevada Sports and Athletic Commission.

Both sides have issues. But both can meet in the middle.

Please STFU. This post had no point.

[fabie]

Please STFU. This post had no point.

Is this how you engage in "conversing"? I didn't do that with you or anybody else. If you disagree with me, there are ways to say it without being lacing with profanities WHILE at the same time not providing any real solutions or legitimate opinions that can be talked about.

[swizz]

Please STFU. This post had no point.

dazed wud up?

this is comical

[IMDAZED]

Is this how you engage in "conversing"? I didn't do that with you or anybody else. If you disagree with me, there are ways to say it without being lacing with profanities WHILE at the same time not providing any real solutions or legitimate opinions that can be talked about.

I have little respect for *******s like you who wax poetic about...NOTHING. I don't disagree with you because you said a whole lot of NOTHING.

[swizz]

Is this how you engage in "conversing"? I didn't do that with you or anybody else. If you disagree with me, there are ways to say it without being lacing with profanities WHILE at the same time not providing any real solutions or legitimate opinions that can be talked about.

nothing to talk about manny is the face of boxing agreeing to random testing would be good for the sport, and he owes boxing atleast that much

[IMDAZED]

dazed wud up?

this is comical

Way too comical. LOL @ finding a "compromise" for drug testing. "We can find common ground!" . Now Morales is a *****. Christ.

[swizz]

how am i red f****** *******s