You don't believe what you're posting lol, I can tell. PAc didn't fight these two guys in rematches, and you're talking about Floyd's heart lol...
Why does Pacquiao want to know the dates when he will be tested?
Collapse
-
-
I thought about this for a long time and concluded...the same thing...why isn't Roger a credible source. He make act funny, and seem a bit ruff around the edges. I think every trainer has their quirks. But, ultimate point is, A trainer is probably more credible than....let's say...a poster on this forum. The guy has been working within this industry for a very long time, I'm sure he's seen and experienced more things than us (with the exceptions of posters whom have experience within the industry). Not to say he is the say all and be all; but for someone (on the forum) to make wild remarks about Roger is just trivial. Believe it or not, there are other individuals that went on record to share the same concern about Pac and the allegation.
Why? To who? Since when did ESPN become the book of record? Roger has already went public in numerous sources.Comment
-
And nobody friggin believes him. I ask you who is generally accepted as the coward in this ordeal? Not just ESPN but most everyone out there like Yahoo, CBSsports, Fox sports, SI, and the general sport watching public. Jeff went public but nobody believes his a-side meth spewing ass. Just look around nobody but the *****s believe him.Why? To who? Since when did ESPN become the book of record? Roger has already went public in numerous sources.Comment
-
Alibata most people dont believe Roger you are right on! Those same people didn't believe Jose Canseco. Keep that in mind!And nobody friggin believes him. I ask you who is generally accepted as the coward in this ordeal? Not just ESPN but most everyone out there like Yahoo, CBSsports, Fox sports, SI, and the general sport watching public. Jeff went public but nobody believes his a-side meth spewing ass. Just look around nobody but the *****s believe him.Comment
-
I'm not arguing what publications feel about Roger, my sole point is, a person in the industry is more credible than that of a person in a forum (fan) unless you have adequate experience within the industry. You didn't provide anything substantial. News outlets have agendas, that is, promote the idea of a fights.And nobody friggin believes him. I ask you who is generally accepted as the coward in this ordeal? Not just ESPN but most everyone out there like Yahoo, CBSsports, Fox sports, SI, and the general sport watching public. Jeff went public but nobody believes his a-side meth spewing ass. Just look around nobody but the *****s believe him.
Now why did you say this? Hasn't Roach made many contridications? Didn't Arum state that there was progress in the fight between both parties, and then admittedly say that there were discussions with Haymon and HBO...NOT mayweather? My point here is there are many contradictory statements made by many people, Roger is no exception.
Disclaimer - I am not a fan of either fighter. Let it be known I side with the sport and industry.
Comment
-
That is why like most I rely on non-biased point of views like ESPN and others more than posters on a forum. Yahoo, Fox, etc. have nothing more to gain by blaming Floyd or Manny. Why are they siding with Manny when they can as easily side with Floyd? Is it because Manny has the momentum in credibility?I'm not arguing what publications feel about Roger, my sole point is, a person in the industry is more credible than that of a person in a forum (fan) unless you have adequate experience within the industry. You didn't provide anything substantial. News outlets have agendas, that is, promote the idea of a fights.
Now why did you say this? Hasn't Roach made many contridications? Didn't Arum state that there was progress in the fight between both parties, and then admittedly say that there were discussions with Haymon and HBO...NOT mayweather? My point here is there are many contradictory statements made by many people, Roger is no exception.
Disclaimer - I am not a fan of either fighter. Let it be known I side with the sport and industry.
Last edited by Alibata; 08-19-2010, 12:16 PM.Comment
-
You know I don't.The point is be careful when the media attacks the messenger rather than the message. If they had just listened to Canseco baseball would be in a better place and you can't deny it. Call Roger and Floyd Sr. anything you want but make SURE they are wrong first!Comment
-
But ESPN isn't non biased. They broadcast boxing. It is in their best interest that the sport not be tainted. That was why they all cam down on Canseco. can't you see that.That is why like most I rely on non-biased point of views like ESPN and others more than posters on a forum. Yahoo, Fox, etc. have nothing more to gain by blaming Floyd or Manny. Why are they siding with Manny when they can as easily side with Floyd? Is it because Manny has the momentum in credibility?Comment

Comment