Comments Thread For: Carl Froch: I'll Fight Pascal Anywhere, Except Germany

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • REMOVED SHARK 97
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 3909
    • 134
    • 124
    • 5,753

    #11
    Or Denmark

    Comment

    • street bully
      Tua's daddy.
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 25014
      • 697
      • 263
      • 35,118

      #12
      The fight will be in Montreal. Pasal drew over 12 thousand fans from what I heard, and the tickets were not cheap either.

      Comment

      • turdleburgle
        Banned
        • Jul 2010
        • 297
        • 49
        • 15
        • 447

        #13
        pascal losing to froch shows how average he is,dawson just had a really poor night.

        Comment

        • black.ink
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 4214
          • 213
          • 165
          • 19,555

          #14
          I'm not sure i see a rematch happening.

          The only way a fight would happen is if Froch loses to Abraham and gets dumped out of the Super-Six.

          What would beating a Froch with back to back defeats prove? I'm sure team Froch would jump for the opportunity if given the chance for a title shot at a second weight...quite undeserved admittedly....but i think team Pascal would think about their options. What about the Dawson rematch clause im hearing? Cloud?

          I'd love to see Froch and Pascal go at it again, this time in Pascals favoured weight division.....but i wouldn't hold my breath.

          Comment

          • Lorily
            currently out of stock
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 2013
            • 281
            • 974
            • 9,108

            #15
            Originally posted by The Weebler II
            Froch said he'd retire if he loses to Abraham but if Pascal throws a lifeline for his career he'd probably take it no matter where the fight is held.
            I didn't realize he had said that.
            In that case, I agree with your original statement.

            Comment

            • benjyyy
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • May 2009
              • 149
              • 6
              • 2
              • 6,503

              #16
              Originally posted by black.ink

              What would beating a Froch with back to back defeats prove?
              It would avenge the defeat he has on his record so it is viable. Also, since it was such a great fight the last time, it is a very marketable fight.

              And to the person saying it should be in Montreal because there were 12000 at the Dawson fight, Im pretty sure they could get a hell of a lot more than that if it was in England.

              Comment

              • z0jo
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 1094
                • 64
                • 56
                • 7,408

                #17
                Originally posted by StarchedLOL
                pascal losing to froch shows how average he is,dawson just had a really poor night.
                could be that or it could be that dawson is a below average fighter

                Comment

                • English puncher
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 511
                  • 9
                  • 0
                  • 6,610

                  #18
                  If you think the froch vs pascal fight was average, then you know absolutly **** all about boxing, what its like to take a punch, what its like to fight in the trenches, about anything....froch is wrong when he says dawson was exposed, anything could have happened in the latter part of the 11th and the 12th...it was a good competitive fight, these guys are elite boxers regardless, people who say they are not have no idea...they genuinally think boxing is wrestling sometimes i think, i rarely leave a comment here lately because so many people are uneducated fans! it just frustrates me to read!

                  Comment

                  • turdleburgle
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 297
                    • 49
                    • 15
                    • 447

                    #19
                    Originally posted by z0jo
                    could be that or it could be that dawson is a below average fighter



                    no dawsons beaten up some good fighters in the past and dominated them while looking skilled in doing so.pascal is just a runner and dawson practically gave him the fight.

                    Comment

                    • turdleburgle
                      Banned
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 297
                      • 49
                      • 15
                      • 447

                      #20
                      Originally posted by English puncher
                      If you think the froch vs pascal fight was average, then you know absolutly **** all about boxing, what its like to take a punch, what its like to fight in the trenches, about anything....froch is wrong when he says dawson was exposed, anything could have happened in the latter part of the 11th and the 12th...it was a good competitive fight, these guys are elite boxers regardless, people who say they are not have no idea...they genuinally think boxing is wrestling sometimes i think, i rarely leave a comment here lately because so many people are uneducated fans! it just frustrates me to read!



                      I never said their fight was average I said pascal as a fighter is average

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP