dawson-pascal proved something

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirt
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 671
    • 9
    • 0
    • 6,818

    #31
    The OP isn't directly relating dawson/pascal to mayweather/pacquiao, respectively.

    he's simply saying that the more technical boxer, no matter how much greater he is, won't always win. There are much more than just boxing skill that determines the winner of a bout.

    So he's saying don't count pacquiao out just because mayweather is the superior boxer in terms of technical skill.

    Comment

    • led
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 7934
      • 2,306
      • 2,762
      • 30,375

      #32
      Originally posted by Spray_resistant
      <<<<< subscribes to this thread for later bumpage after the rematch

      seriously TS, you are jumping to some crazy conclusions about Dawson after just 1 bad performance.
      in the first place, i never said that this fight is an all end to the pac-floyd arguments.

      you may see the word might alot of times in my post.

      Comment

      • KickAzz
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 4487
        • 59
        • 11
        • 4,761

        #33
        floyd is 10x better than dawson, but its possible that pac would outwork floyd

        Comment

        • Kagami Taiga
          Generation of Miracles
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 19078
          • 703
          • 228
          • 40,183

          #34
          Originally posted by retnuocllup
          floyd is 10x better than dawson, but its possible that pac would outwork floyd
          pac will out work floyd but that doesnt mean he'll look good doing it. if he looks like **** and floyd makes him look dumb then he loses.

          Comment

          • mathed
            molṑn labé
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 54549
            • 2,741
            • 2,984
            • 224,675

            #35
            That idea may have already crossed Floyd's mind. That Pac's aggression and speed may be a problem...maybe, just maybe.......or maybe not. I guess we'll have to wait until 2011 to find out.

            Comment

            • led
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2010
              • 7934
              • 2,306
              • 2,762
              • 30,375

              #36
              Originally posted by mathed
              That idea may have already crossed Floyd's mind. That Pac's aggression and speed may be a problem...maybe, just maybe.......or maybe not. I guess we'll have to wait until 2011 to find out.
              right but totally sayin that pac has no chance is silly.

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54549
                • 2,741
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #37
                Originally posted by led
                right but totally sayin that pac has no chance is silly.
                Personally, I think Pac has an excellent chance to destroy Floyd

                Comment

                • led
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 7934
                  • 2,306
                  • 2,762
                  • 30,375

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Dirt
                  The OP isn't directly relating dawson/pascal to mayweather/pacquiao, respectively.

                  he's simply saying that the more technical boxer, no matter how much greater he is, won't always win. There are much more than just boxing skill that determines the winner of a bout.

                  So he's saying don't count pacquiao out just because mayweather is the superior boxer in terms of technical skill.
                  yea, right. cheers to that!

                  Comment

                  • led
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 7934
                    • 2,306
                    • 2,762
                    • 30,375

                    #39
                    Originally posted by retnuocllup
                    floyd is 10x better than dawson, but its possible that pac would outwork floyd
                    pac is 10x better than pascal

                    Originally posted by DempseyRollin
                    pac will out work floyd but that doesnt mean he'll look good doing it. if he looks like **** and floyd makes him look dumb then he loses.
                    absolutely

                    Originally posted by mathed
                    Personally, I think Pac has an excellent chance to destroy Floyd
                    cosign.

                    Comment

                    • JDezi4
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 3822
                      • 95
                      • 194
                      • 10,052

                      #40
                      Originally posted by led
                      idk if its 3rd time. since you said if. what if dawson went in to counter the flurry what do you think would happen? lots of if.

                      one thing is sure, athleticism beats skills that night.
                      Lol, it's kinda ridiculous for u to have focused on THAT specific part of my comment. The point was, Dawson is not a counter puncher, Floyd is. That's a drastic style difference

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP