dawson-pascal proved something

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mitch5
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2010
    • 368
    • 14
    • 0
    • 6,435

    #21
    Here we go with this..pascal-dawson doesn't eual pac-may..it just doesn't...floyd does many things dawson doesn't do, and pac does many things pascal doesn't do...dawson didn't have the will to win that night, he didn't use the jab, and didnt counter often he just covered up when pascal threw..actually dawson looked more like clottey with that performance he had saturday

    Comment

    • GoogleMe
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 3459
      • 108
      • 145
      • 12,675

      #22
      Mayweather is WAY better then Chad Dawson.

      Comment

      • led
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 7934
        • 2,306
        • 2,762
        • 30,375

        #23
        Originally posted by V-3
        Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Chad and Jean have zero to do with Floyd and Manny.
        yes they have nothing to do with it. except chad proved alot wrong.

        here's a quote from a certain poster here, i wont name him. and he is a floyd fan where he also wrote this in a way comparing floyd and pac.

        "Chad Dawson will rule the sport as number 1 P4P in 2 years. You won't doubt him again after this bout. He will show you that he is in a class above Jean Pascal(who I would be rooting for if he wasn't against Chad) and anyone else near his weight."

        Comment

        • led
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 7934
          • 2,306
          • 2,762
          • 30,375

          #24
          Originally posted by GoogleMe
          Mayweather is WAY better then Chad Dawson.
          pacquiao is way better than jean pascal

          Comment

          • led
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 7934
            • 2,306
            • 2,762
            • 30,375

            #25
            Originally posted by Mitch5
            Here we go with this..pascal-dawson doesn't eual pac-may..it just doesn't...floyd does many things dawson doesn't do, and pac does many things pascal doesn't do...dawson didn't have the will to win that night, he didn't use the jab, and didnt counter often he just covered up when pascal threw..actually dawson looked more like clottey with that performance he had saturday
            in bold letter. is that an excuse?

            Comment

            • Mitch5
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • May 2010
              • 368
              • 14
              • 0
              • 6,435

              #26
              Originally posted by led
              in bold letter. is that an excuse?
              no excuse for how dawson looked...to me he just didnt look like he had that will to win saturday.

              Comment

              • led
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 7934
                • 2,306
                • 2,762
                • 30,375

                #27
                Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1502
                Pascal doesn't = Pacman and Dawson doesn't = Mayweather.

                It's a stretch to say the least.
                yes, floyd and pac are better than those two. but an upset is always there.

                Comment

                • led
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 7934
                  • 2,306
                  • 2,762
                  • 30,375

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Mitch5
                  no excuse for how dawson looked...to me he just didnt look like he had that will to win saturday.
                  pascal's game have made dawson looked that way.

                  Comment

                  • Spray_resistant
                    Edgelord Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 29162
                    • 2,702
                    • 1,440
                    • 53,384

                    #29
                    <<<<< subscribes to this thread for later bumpage after the rematch

                    seriously TS, you are jumping to some crazy conclusions about Dawson after just 1 bad performance.

                    Comment

                    • led
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 7934
                      • 2,306
                      • 2,762
                      • 30,375

                      #30
                      Originally posted by JDezi4
                      Isn't this like the third time someone made a thread like this? How do u even compare Mayweather to Dawson? Their styles r completely different. One's a conventional boxer, one's an unorthodox counterpuncher. The one thing that mess Dawson up is when Pascal went in to run his flurry, Dawson covers up. If he'd have countered (which he did in the 11th and stopped Pascal in his tracks) it would have been a completely different fight. And the fact u people r even comparing Pascal to Pacquiao is in itself an insult to Pacquiao. That just ******ed
                      idk if its 3rd time. since you said if. what if dawson went in to counter the flurry what do you think would happen? lots of if.

                      one thing is sure, athleticism beats skills that night.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP