The OFFICIAL : Dawson vs. Pascal RBR and Discussion thread!!!!!

[Hannibal Barca]

STFU you little ho's.

I've been watching boxing since before you two ****s got in your training bra's and learned how to use maxi pads.

Was that supposed to incite laughter? Get outta here with that weak @ss ****.

[Allucard]

I may be in the minority here but I don't think Pascal is just not good enough to "test" Dawson. If Pascal somehow wins rounds and gets the better of Chad, then Chad Dawson isn't as good as I think he is.

Dawson has failed to impress me in his last 2 fights. He either picks it up here and starts KOing at least some of those guys or he'll be Jermain Taylor part 2 waiting to happen.

[Iceta Lives]

I just find it funny how people constantly make threads about Dawson being a P4P caliber fighter when he didn't even beat Tarver as impressively in either fight as Hopkins did in one.

[onechance87]

I'm going with dawson by dec.

[Hannibal Barca]

I just find it funny how people constantly make threads about Dawson being a P4P caliber fighter when he didn't even beat Tarver as impressively in either fight as Hopkins did in one.

Because Hopkins is a bum right?

[Dick Buffman]

I may be in the minority here but I don't think Pascal is just not good enough to "test" Dawson. If Pascal somehow wins rounds and gets the better of Chad, then Chad Dawson isn't as good as I think he is.

I think thats it.

That would be Berto.

Cut from the same cloth.

What about the Tarver fights and the Johnson rematch? No holding there. Straight-up domination.

Both guys were 40' and the domination wasn't all that great. It actually ****** imo cuz' he had a couple of dead men in front of him and all he could do is go to decision.

And it's Glengoffe, Poon.

Never do that again.

And if he doesn't? Still more threads about how horrendously terrible Dawson is?

If he is impressive in beating Pascal i.e hurts him, drops him and stops him, then I will give props.

If its a ****ty decision win that seems borderline, I'll continue to hammer him.

[Tiozzo]

I just find it funny how people constantly make threads about Dawson being a P4P caliber fighter when he didn't even beat Tarver as impressively in either fight as Hopkins did in one.

Dawson outworked Tarver

Hopkins dismantled Tarver

but we could arguable say in Chad's favor that Tarver had to cut a lot of weight to fight Hop...

[Iceta Lives]

Because Hopkins is a bum right?

Here's the thing though. You guys bash Hopkins for ducking Dawson and you don't use the analogy that Dawson didn't even beat Tarver as impressively as Hopkins did, but you use the excuse of Dawson not fighting Cloud because Cloud didn't beat Johnson as decisively as Dawson did in the rematch with him. I know a lot of people including myself think Cloud lost against Johnson. But it's still double standards.

[Shadows]

I just find it funny how people constantly make threads about Dawson being a P4P caliber fighter when he didn't even beat Tarver as impressively in either fight as Hopkins did in one.

Didn't you have Roman Gonzalez in your top ten P4P, only to say a few months later that you've never seen him fight?

[Hannibal Barca]

I think thats it.



Cut from the same cloth.




Both guys were 40' and the domination wasn't all that great. It actually ****** imo cuz' he had a couple of dead men in front of him and all he could do is go to decision.




Never do that again.



If he is impressive in beating Pascal i.e hurts him, drops him and stops him, then I will give props.

If its a ****ty decision win that seems borderline, I'll continue to hammer him.

The more you post, the more you reveal your idiocy.

Berto and Dawson are nothing alike.

Those "40 year old men" were atop the division, and consistently taking out younger opponents. In fact Johnson just took Cloud to hell and back.

You don't know **** about boxing.