I see many of the people who thought Dirrell clearly beat Froch saying Alexander beat Kotelnik. Those same people who talked about how Froch wasn't landing and Dirrell landed all the clean punches are now defending Alexander getting outlanded just because he threw more, though just like Dirrell Kotelnik landed more and landed harder. That's serious hypocrisy.
For those who fall under this category, explain how going backwards, getting outlanded, and getting hit by a big majority of the clean punches deserves a win but going forward, getting outlanded, and getting hit by most of the clean punches mean the guy got outboxed?
For the record, I thought Dirrell won clearly and I think Kotelnik won clearly.
For those who fall under this category, explain how going backwards, getting outlanded, and getting hit by a big majority of the clean punches deserves a win but going forward, getting outlanded, and getting hit by most of the clean punches mean the guy got outboxed?
For the record, I thought Dirrell won clearly and I think Kotelnik won clearly.
Comment