Before Taylor fought Nard I did not really think a whole hell of a lot about him and it seemed like many thought he was god.
Now, after the fight between Taylor and Nard I am now convicned that this kid can fight and be champ for a long time.
But it appears many now think the kid is garbage because he won a controverisal either way decision against Hopkins???
If Taylor can beat Nard he can beat Winky, people are overating Winky and sooner or later Wright is gonna get thrashed leaving many who thought he was this unbeatable fighter in limbo.
Winky is good but he is not great, Taylor beats him relatively easy.
Winky is as seasoned and smart as Bernard with better defense, Bernard hits harder. If Taylor couldnt beat, or hit Bernard with one clean shot no way in hell he beats Winky. Who has the even better jab.
Winky is as seasoned and smart as Bernard with better defense, Bernard hits harder. If Taylor couldnt beat, or hit Bernard with one clean shot no way in hell he beats Winky. Who has the even better jab.
1) Winky is not as smart as Bernard.
2) How the **** is Winky as seasoned as Bernard?
3) There is no ****ing way Winky has better defense than Bernard!
"Hello King", Bernard is a rich dude and when I mean he is rich I mean he's got his own money, no what im sayin King?
1. Yes he is as smart as Bernard. I didnt say smarter.
2. Winky is 36 and payed his dues.
3. Winky reads his opponents punches just as well as Hopkins, does the shoulder tuck and covers up as good as Hopkins. Tito hit bernard more than he did Winky.
Comment