Wladi***** has to fight Peter if he want's to be #1 IBF. Will he man up?

[hairyflex]

The fight wont happen, Wlad will end up takeing some meaningless fight against someone else.

[Torino]

The fact that someone would try to defend being knocked down by a 3rd rate fighter is the real joke.

That kind of thing happens to just about everyone. It happens all the time. It meant nothing, that's why Wlad got up at the count of one.

[Run.]

The fact that someone would try to defend being knocked down by a 3rd rate fighter is the real joke.

Hopkins was knocked down by Sergundo Mercado. LOL

[masterdirector]

Some fool said if Wlad would've used the same "strategy" that Vitali used against Sanders, he would've won. What strategy was that exactly? To go to war and exchange punches with him? Yeah, Wlad would've won, at all, idiot. And if Wlad thought Sanders was tough, let him try that "strategy" as you called it, against Sam Peter.

Yeah, I totally think Wlad ducks Peter and ends up never fighting him. Wlad wants to live.

[Sir_Jose]

Hopkins was knocked down by Sergundo Mercado. LOL

Was Hopkins also knocked out by 3 journeyman?

Thats right he wasn't was he.

[SUPER ZAB FAN]

Was Hopkins also knocked out by 3 journeyman?

Thats right he wasn't was he.

YOu forgot the Semi Pro Golfer

[scap]

This whole "Wlad getting KO'ed" and "Weak chin" thing is blown way out of proportion. He does have some question marks, but his career isn't over and he doesn't "suck" just because he got KO'ed. Those that keep saying he's no good because he got KO'ed, don't know a thing about boxing.

1st, Sanders is a much bigger puncher than Wlad critics are willing to admit. In fact, Sanders had enough power to KO practically anyone in the division. I don't want to hear about how Sanders "didn't KO this guy" or "that guy". That's all BS. There are too many variables why he didn't KO all his opponents. One thing is for sure, If Sanders landed a clean shot on anyone like he did on Wlad, they would've gotten KO'ed too.

In his fight with Brewster, It clearly had nothing to do with his "chin". Everyone knows it, and I will leave it at that.

The fact that all the haters keep bringing up that Wlad got knocked down by Williamson, is just a joke. I bet they can't even type that and keep a straight face. It's just rhetoric and they know that knock down was nothing.

Wlad getting KO'ed means nothing. He can still succeed and become a great champion. Some of the greatest heavyweights in the history of the sport have gotten KO'ed.

Here is a list of some of those boxers.

Muhammad Ali
Ezzard Charles
Jimmy Bivins
Joe Louis
Floyd Patterson
Evander Holyfield
Jersey Joe Walcott
Mike Tyson
Lennox Lewis
Jack Sharkey
George Foreman
Max Baer
Johnny Risko
Sonny Liston
Max Schmeling
Primo Carnera
Larry Holmes
Joe Frazier
Bob Satterfield
Michael Spinks
Nino Valdes
Lee Q Murray

And many ......many more. In fact, It's a lot harder to find those that didn't get KO'ed. Any boxer can, and most likely will get KO'ed. It's the nature of the sport. So what does it mean that Wlad got KO'ed? Nothing.

This is a wonderful list...now how many on the list were ko'd in two consecutive fights?

[scap]

...God I hope your wrong about this one man. Should I let the whole Wlad thing go? Are you 100% sure he is toast? Any scintila of doubt in there?

Pbds, focus on Vitaly Klitchko!

Heavyweights who cant mix it up a little bit are destined to be thrashed. VK can take shots, Wlad cannot take shots....

I think he may be in a few more competitive fights but as long as his opponent comes at him with the intention of knocking him out from the get go Wlad is finished.

When he was #1 contender and ****ing guys up left and right fighters were just content to sit back and get destroyed, now the chin has been exposed and there is no hiding any longer I dont care how good of an offensive fighter he is.

[jabsRstiff]

This is a wonderful list...now how many on the list were ko'd in two consecutive fights?

I like how he puts Ali & Holmes on the list....
Two guys who weren't stopped until well past their best....& were stopped by awesome fighters (Ali by young Holmes....& Holmes by a young Mike Tyson).

Pathetic to use those two when trying to make a fighter like Wlad look good.
Purritty, Sanders, & Brewster....KOing a young, prime Wlad Klit=
MEDIOCRITY.

[Torino]

I like how he puts Ali & Holmes on the list....
Two guys who weren't stopped until well past their best....& were stopped by awesome fighters (Ali by young Holmes....& Holmes by a young Mike Tyson).

Pathetic to use those two when trying to make a fighter like Wlad look good.
Purritty, Sanders, & Brewster....KOing a young, prime Wlad Klit=
MEDIOCRITY.

The list is of those that got KO'ed. That is the only criteria. Ali & Holmes Got Ko'ed. Therefore, they are on the list.

The point was, Wlad got KO'ed and it's not the end of his career. He could still be a champion. I wasn't trying to make Wlad look good. I was simply trying to put his situation into it's proper perspective. History proves that getting KO'ed is not the end of the road.

This is a wonderful list...now how many on the list were ko'd in two consecutive fights?

What difference does that make? I don't understand the reason for asking this question.

???????????