Tweet
Originally posted by del515
View Post
Your logic Yesir is on par with a Mayweather Sr. I'll go ahead and give you an epiphany since your looking really ridiculous at this stage.
Actually DLH is possibly the prime example of using one's own legacy to establish a means of generating wealth. Mayweather's own undefeated record is additional proof too. We can toss in Sugar Ray Leonard and Ali as well. The fact is that a boxer can use their legacy to further their own financial success. Neither is mutually exclusive and if you can't understand this logic, feel free to ask your kindergarten teacher for an explanation. If Ali wasn't a star, his current merchandise wouldn't sell. If Sugar Ray Leonard wasn't a boxing celebrity he wouldn't have appeared in Seinfeld. One thing you yourself need to account for then is simply name a situation where a bad/failed legacy in the sport of boxing paid bills? When Mayweather's legacy declines so will his support from the public. He built his legacy and aura of being "unbeatable" to maintain his status as a draw and if he can't maintain it, then he can expect more IRS visits and lower PPV's if he ever "un-retires" again. Fact is Pac is the only dance partner who can both cement his legacy and provide the biggest payday he's ever had.
So what's keeping Mayweather then? Let's say I make a poll and make it even more cynical and ask everyone here "Hey who here wouldn't mind taking a dive or getting their a@@ beat in boxing for 40M? Hell you can run back or whatever you want, its a 40M payday regardless!".
When Mayweather goes out there and says "I'm the best ever because I'm undefeated" and "I fight for money" he has no excuse whatsoever for not taking a fight with Pac in the end. If he fights for money then that's the most he'll ever make. If he wants to unconditionally substantiate his claim about being the "best ever", then there's his chance as well. Its 2 birds with one stone. I don't have to go any further than using Mayweather's own words as to justify his own actions.
In psychology they teach that when generally accepting a truth that is difficult to both believe and accept the first step is anger followed by denial. I know which step your on and no need to be in denial about it, I understand that its a phase your going through and its tough, I can emphasize. It's not an easy truth to accept that your man Mayweather is now in the runnings to be the face of purdue chicken
So I'll give you time to let the emotions ride out their course.
Actually DLH is possibly the prime example of using one's own legacy to establish a means of generating wealth. Mayweather's own undefeated record is additional proof too. We can toss in Sugar Ray Leonard and Ali as well. The fact is that a boxer can use their legacy to further their own financial success. Neither is mutually exclusive and if you can't understand this logic, feel free to ask your kindergarten teacher for an explanation. If Ali wasn't a star, his current merchandise wouldn't sell. If Sugar Ray Leonard wasn't a boxing celebrity he wouldn't have appeared in Seinfeld. One thing you yourself need to account for then is simply name a situation where a bad/failed legacy in the sport of boxing paid bills? When Mayweather's legacy declines so will his support from the public. He built his legacy and aura of being "unbeatable" to maintain his status as a draw and if he can't maintain it, then he can expect more IRS visits and lower PPV's if he ever "un-retires" again. Fact is Pac is the only dance partner who can both cement his legacy and provide the biggest payday he's ever had.
So what's keeping Mayweather then? Let's say I make a poll and make it even more cynical and ask everyone here "Hey who here wouldn't mind taking a dive or getting their a@@ beat in boxing for 40M? Hell you can run back or whatever you want, its a 40M payday regardless!".
When Mayweather goes out there and says "I'm the best ever because I'm undefeated" and "I fight for money" he has no excuse whatsoever for not taking a fight with Pac in the end. If he fights for money then that's the most he'll ever make. If he wants to unconditionally substantiate his claim about being the "best ever", then there's his chance as well. Its 2 birds with one stone. I don't have to go any further than using Mayweather's own words as to justify his own actions.
In psychology they teach that when generally accepting a truth that is difficult to both believe and accept the first step is anger followed by denial. I know which step your on and no need to be in denial about it, I understand that its a phase your going through and its tough, I can emphasize. It's not an easy truth to accept that your man Mayweather is now in the runnings to be the face of purdue chicken
So I'll give you time to let the emotions ride out their course.
Comment