Bernard Hopkins vs. Larry Merchant

**Ivansmamma** · 08-04-2010, 07:29 AM

Hopkins is basically right, he had to fight his mandatorys but it's kind of lame calling out light middleweights.

**oc9979** · 08-04-2010, 07:44 AM

Originally posted by Ivansmamma

Hopkins is basically right, he had to fight his mandatorys but it's kind of lame calling out light middleweights.

I know instead of calling out super middleweight.

**Carpe Diem** · 08-04-2010, 07:51 AM

He owned Larry.

**Sam Donald** · 08-04-2010, 07:52 AM

Who did hopkins just fight there?

Junior Middleweights? Hopkins does have a point about 10/15years there was no junior middleweights. I think boxing needs to get back like it was with non of that super junior crap.

edit: the four belts is fine! i dont wanna see another one though, 4 is enough

**cortdawg25** · 08-04-2010, 07:57 AM

Hilarious....Hopkins got him and outwitted him right there. If larry mad....he should be mad at the sanctioning bodeis for making the guy mandatory!

**FromAfrica** · 08-04-2010, 08:01 AM

Originally posted by GAME2010

Who did hopkins just fight there?

Junior Middleweights? Hopkins does have a point about 10/15years there was no junior middleweights. I think boxing needs to get back like it was with non of that super junior crap.

edit: the four belts is fine! i dont wanna see another one though, 4 is enough

Morrade Hakkar

**bishop2006** · 08-04-2010, 08:04 AM

Bernard was right,he fought his mandatory challenger,if he didnt,he would have been stripped by the WBC,which happens to be the most recognised belt,so what is he to do? He's just going by the rules,Larry hates alot

**Carpe Diem** · 08-04-2010, 08:11 AM

Did he said to Larry "Stop being a N.....!"?

**FromAfrica** · 08-04-2010, 08:14 AM

Originally posted by P4P305

Did he said to Larry "Stop being a N.....!"?

That's what i thought he said at first but he said "stop being ignorant"

Bernard Hopkins vs. Larry Merchant