Originally posted by Tarver is my dad
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hopkins stuns Taylor in rounds 10 & 11
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Soldier01Judges look more at aggressiveness not compubox stats. Taylor was being the aggressor of the 2 till about the 10th round when he started tiring.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by boxermanI had it a draw as well. THe fighters faces at the end told the story of how they really thought the fight went. Hopkins was smiling with DLH, then he had the most shocked look on his face ive ever seen when the decision was read. On Taylor's side it was the opposite.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ParodiusI'm not a blind **** like some of you asslickers of Hopkins. The guy only won 3 rounds & that is it. Why don't you read some of my older post, you will see that I actually respect that dirty Hopkins. I've said some great things about Hopkins. But I'm honest & I don't like nut-huggers or asslickers. Taylor won 7 rounds. Noway you win a fight with last the 3 rounds. Folks if you think you're not a nut-hugger & still think that Hopkins won the fight, then this the fight that will test your eyes. If you think Hopkins won, then I recommend that you guys get your eyes checked, maybe it's time for some eye glasses.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrCoopYour a ****in joke man! From what I've been reading the consensus is that around 50 percent of people think Taylor won & other half believe Hopkins won or was a draw. Guys that no a hell of alot more about boxing than you & I like RJJ & Max Kellerman believe that Hokins won or at least was a draw. ARE THEY BLIND TOO? STOP SPEAKING LIKE YOUR OPINION IS ****IN FACT OR THE GOSPEL. **** EVEN TAYLOR THOUGHT HE LOST & HE WAS IN THE RING. My thing is that a guy being busier but not really landing any punches should not be any better than another fighter not landing many either & being less busy. In the beginning rounds all Taylor was doing more than Hopkins was wasting enery & that was Bernards plan. So how can a guy that is wasting useless energy & doing exactly what his opponent wants him to do actually be convincingly winning those rounds. I believe it should have been SD for Hopkins or at best for Taylor a draw. He definitely didn't do enough to take an all-time greats title. But hey that is boxing. I love it & at the same time hate it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ParodiusLike I said either your a blind **** or an Hopkins nut-hugger. Guess what the 50% thinks that Hopkins won is one of the 2. Max Kellerman had the fight 115-113 for Hopkins, Kellerman is a nut-hugger just like yourself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bozo_no_noThis has nothing to do with talk of scoring the fight of debating the score, so keep the bickering elsewhere.
Simply put, here's where Hopkins stunned Taylor in:
Round 10:
& Round 11:
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrCoopIt sounds to me like you have officially graduated & got you PHD (Playa Haters degree) or you are a "Taylor nuthugger". I tell you one thing I thought Hopkins won & if I'm a "nutthugger" then Jermain Taylor must be a Hopkins "Nutthugger" too because the way he acted after the fight surely shows he thought Hopkins won. P.S. Nutthuggers are most likely the type of jeans you have on because they are probably tight & cutting off oxygen to your brain thus explaining your biased posts toward Hopkins. IT WAS A VERY CLOSE FIGHT & TO SAY IT WASN'T SHOWS YOUR BIAS OR THAT YOU ARE ACTUALLY STEVIE WONDER POSTING ON A BOXING MESSAGEBOARD!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ParodiusFirst of all you shouldn't make fun of Stevie wonder, especially a blind nut-hugger like yourself should not make fun of a blind man. Go ***** all you want, you're a little ***** just like Hopkins.
Comment
Comment