Henry Armstrong Catchweight Conspiracy Exposed!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Flomo Tard
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jun 2010
    • 241
    • 24
    • 0
    • 306

    #1

    Henry Armstrong Catchweight Conspiracy Exposed!

    When Henry Armstrong won the welterweight world title from Barney Ross, they both fought at a catchweight of 140 lbs.

    And as mentioned earlier, Sugar Ray Leonard fought for and defended world titles at catchweights too.
  • baracuda
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 10779
    • 259
    • 569
    • 11,470

    #2
    it's only wrong if its pacquiao doing it!

    Comment

    • Sin City
      la mala vida
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2006
      • 27551
      • 1,757
      • 2,208
      • 47,596

      #3
      umm.. what conspiracy? & you arent exposing ****... this is common knowledge lol

      Comment

      • baracuda
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 10779
        • 259
        • 569
        • 11,470

        #4
        Originally posted by NChristo


        There was no Super Lightweight or Junior Welterweight weight classes back then, 140 was not catch weight.

        like you said there wwre only 8 weightclasses back then and 140 was'nt one of them, therefore 140 was a catchweight...

        Comment

        • Benny Leonard
          Liberty
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 7436
          • 303
          • 38
          • 14,471

          #5
          How about Sam Langford, did he do it too?

          I'm actually asking by the way.


          Still all the reason why the Heavyweights are King.

          Comment

          • NChristo
            The Keed
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 5606
            • 369
            • 149
            • 18,296

            #6
            Originally posted by baracuda
            like you said there wwre only 8 weightclasses back then and 140 was'nt one of them, therefore 140 was a catchweight...
            I know, never mind I got confused, it's late here lol.
            My bad, realized after I wrote it.

            Comment

            • crold1
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 6354
              • 328
              • 122
              • 19,304

              #7
              Originally posted by Flomo Tard
              When Henry Armstrong won the welterweight world title from Barney Ross, they both fought at a catchweight of 140 lbs.
              No. They didn't. Armstrong was supposed to come in at a required higher weight but that got scrubbed...Ross weighed 142, come as he was. Armstrong gave up almost ten pounds.

              The sheer number of dumb hank threads today is mind boggling.

              Comment

              • NChristo
                The Keed
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 5606
                • 369
                • 149
                • 18,296

                #8
                Originally posted by Benny Leonard
                How about Sam Langford, did he do it too?

                I'm actually asking by the way.


                Still all the reason why the Heavyweights are King.
                Sam fought Jack Blackburn for the Welterweight title at a catch weight of 142, all the reason Heavies are king ?, I'd say Langford's best weight was MW.

                Comment

                • Benny Leonard
                  Liberty
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 7436
                  • 303
                  • 38
                  • 14,471

                  #9
                  Originally posted by NChristo
                  Sam fought Jack Blackburn for the Welterweight title at a catch weight of 142, all the reason Heavies are king ?, I'd say Langford's best weight was MW.
                  was that Langford's doing or Blackburn?




                  Yes, HW = King
                  Last edited by Benny Leonard; 07-25-2010, 09:01 PM.

                  Comment

                  • NChristo
                    The Keed
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 5606
                    • 369
                    • 149
                    • 18,296

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Benny Leonard
                    was that Langford's doing or Blackburn?


                    Yes, HW = King
                    Blackburn's doing, it was made so that even if Langford beat Blackburn, he would still be seen the legitimate title holder and Langford wouldn't, it was still ruled as a title fight though.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP