question to klitschko and non klitschko fans

**shade darkar** · 07-23-2010, 08:44 AM

just tunney seen as tho he seems to know it all! lol

**joe strong** · 07-23-2010, 09:29 AM

Originally posted by shade darkar

just tunney seen as tho he seems to know it all! lol

i wont say that but its funny how noone will answer or post any validity...its funny because everyone on this site makes assumptions with no proof....talk is cheap

**Tiozzo** · 07-23-2010, 10:26 AM

Well Klitschkos never denied putting in the contract that Haye had to fight them 3 times (Wlad, Vitali, Wlad) should he win.

Right now the Klits are on top of the world like it or not, and they can do what they please, whether it's fighting tomato cans or submitting fighters to slave contracts.

If they ever lose their belts, they want them back to make some more millions.

I say let's wait for some more details on Povetkin's and Klitschko's end to debate that question.

**joe strong** · 07-23-2010, 10:37 AM

Originally posted by LeTombeur

Well Klitschkos never denied putting in the contract that Haye had to fight them 3 times (Wlad, Vitali, Wlad) should he win.

Right now the Klits are on top of the world like it or not, and they can do what they please, whether it's fighting tomato cans or submitting fighters to slave contracts.

If they ever lose their belts, they want them back to make some more millions.

I say let's wait for some more details on Povetkin's and Klitschko's end to debate that question.

my question was where is the proof by all posters? they all speculate whats in the contract...im saying prove it...no one knows thats all im saying...its all he said,she said bull****.

**WladIsTheChamp** · 07-23-2010, 10:53 AM

Originally posted by joe strong

how many of you were at the negotiation table for the valuev,haye,sasha fights? how many of you have read the contract from cover to cover? i bet none of you....if you claim to which we all know is a lie,prove it....its all speculation

It's a standard IBF mandatory contract, with 25% going to the challenger, with no options. The minor details about the number of tickets to be given to the challenger's and boxing gloves, are all minor.

That's the same argument Haye's Gayes use when trying to excuse Diva Gaye's punk ass.

We don't need to know all the detail to make a judgment call, the facts speak for themselves - Gaye and Povetkin both blatantly ducked Wlad multiple times.

**joe strong** · 07-23-2010, 10:31 PM

Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp

It's a standard IBF mandatory contract, with 25% going to the challenger, with no options. The minor details about the number of tickets to be given to the challenger's and boxing gloves, are all minor.

That's the same argument Haye's Gayes use when trying to excuse Diva Gaye's punk ass.

We don't need to know all the detail to make a judgment call, the facts speak for themselves - Gaye and Povetkin both blatantly ducked Wlad multiple times.

since you know so much....post the contract...what is so hard about that...you are just talking with no substance...i wont believe you or anyone else until i see the paper work for myself...again another speculation by a person with no proof...

**Chunk..** · 07-23-2010, 10:34 PM

One thing that is certiain is that Haye and Povetkin both called out Wlad. It wasn't the other way round.

**King Of Ring** · 08-24-2010, 12:22 AM

klitkos will beat anybody today

question to klitschko and non klitschko fans