Suddenly champions can't have the lions' share & rematch clauses?

**Rick Grimes** · 07-23-2010, 07:51 AM

Originally posted by Rosseboi

What?

Is the world mad or just turned upside down?

or is it just because people don't like the Klit brothers personally?

Lewis, Holyfield, Ali, Tyson; they all had clauses but the Klitschkos? oh no they can't have them. Slave contracts you call them.

**** Wlad gives haye a non rematch contract with straiught 50/50 and still that ***** don't take it and still people rag on him......like wtf that aint fright!!!

Man people need to seriously man up and just stop ragging on the brothers.

1) Wlad is the universal ring champ & recognized best HW & Haye wanted him so to expect anymore than 50/50 is bull****.

2) Povetkin WANTED to be IBF mandatory so he needs to quit bitching for getting standard mandatory figures.

3) Valuev aint got **** choices left. He gets a shot @ the WBC belt and 2 million which in russia with the exchange rate is like $10,000,000!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND HE STILL BITCHES!!!

Boxong fans...pff...I don't understand them sometimes......this isn't football it's boxing. people have earnt the right to get the lions share guys....shesh...

Those fighters had one rematch clause not two and they weren't forced to fight a different fighter if they won.

Haye wanted the UK rights and Wlad gets to keep the German, looks fair to me.

**Rosseboi** · 07-23-2010, 07:57 AM

Originally posted by Mr. Blobby

Those fighters had one rematch clause not two and they weren't forced to fight a different fighter if they won.

Haye wanted the UK rights and Wlad gets to keep the German, looks fair to me.

Show me proof Povetkin and Valuev will be forced to have TWO rematches?

And Haye wanted 50/50 he got it. Not my fault he changed his mind; again, stop defending him. Either way it is irrelevant Wlad is the real champion which is the topic of this thread.

**Rick Grimes** · 07-23-2010, 08:01 AM

Originally posted by Rosseboi

Show me proof Povetkin and Valuev will be forced to have TWO rematches?

And Haye wanted 50/50 he got it. Not my fault he changed his mind; again, stop defending him. Either way it is irrelevant Wlad is the real champion which is the topic of this thread.

Valuev said there was a 2 rematch clause and i believe him because the Klitscko's have a history of doing it (Haye) and haven't denied it. We don't know what was in the Povetkin contract yet but i'm sure it will come out soon.

**joe strong** · 07-23-2010, 08:01 AM

there is nothing wrong with 1 rematch clause for the former champ but to have to fight his brother after the rematch is plain ****** & unproffessional & nothin wrong with getting the bigger piece of the pie but the $$$ for the rematch should be negotiated after the original fight not before it....besides a rematch means the champ lost..makes sense to me

**Rosseboi** · 07-23-2010, 08:03 AM

C'mon bud.....we both now what fighters will say to save face - it is their career after all. I don't blame them but I know it's BS.

I'm sure at the very least Povetkin being Wlad's mandatory must fight under IBF rules - eg: 1 rematch.

Suddenly champions can't have the lions' share & rematch clauses?