WHICH ONE was the better FIGHT?

[FrankJack]

Castillo/Corrales was the better fight. 10 great rounds vs. 3 great rounds doesn't even out, simple as that.

[Slipx]

castillo corrales was a great fight

hagler hearns was legendary, there's a difference, but i dont expect novices to understand that. carry on.

[Parodius]

castillo corrales was a great fight

hagler hearns was legendary, there's a difference, but i dont expect novices to understand that. carry on.

We know it was a bigger fight. It was to legends of boxing fighting. This Thread didn't ask which fight was more legendary, it asked which one was a better fight. Do you get it now or not.

[TheBrownBomber22]

It has to be Hagler v Hearns for me, might have been just three rounds of boxing but WHAT three rounds of boxing they were.

[Slipx]

We know it was a bigger fight. It was to legends of boxing fighting. This Thread didn't ask which fight was more legendary, it asked which one was a better fight. Do you get it now or not.

that display of ignorance right there owns yourself, you seriously thought i was talking about how legendary each fighter was? rofl.

i expect jlc-corrales to get a higher vote, the ignorant masses always win when it comes to a vote, just look at george bush election.

[Parodius]

that display of ignorance right there owns yourself, you seriously thought i was talking about how legendary each fighter was? rofl.

i expect jlc-corrales to get a higher vote, the ignorant masses always win when it comes to a vote, just look at george bush election.

Man you need help, you should go back to smoking what you smoking. You say one thing, now you say another thing.

[jabsRstiff]

I'll give Hagler-Hearns the slight edge.

Hagler-Hearns....is the BENCHMARK for ferocity & breathtaking excitement.

Since 1985....it's the fight all others are compared to....

Corrales-Castillo is an all-time great fight....certainly the best in a long time.

But.."Hagler-Hearns"......that fight meant so much, it has almost become a boxing cliche.

[Slipx]

Man you need help, you should go back to smoking what you smoking. You say one thing, now you say another thing.

actually you're just full of ****.

the reason hagler hearns was better is

nobody pussied out at the end spitting out their mouthpiece

way more elite moves were used, check out hearns using the ropes for leverage in round one,

hearns broke his right hand on haglers head in round one, that was an epic punch and proves he had an epic chin..not to mention add hella drama to the fight and show how brave and great hearns was for continuing to throw that right hand even after it was broke


it was war from the opening bell very much on a different level than jlc castillo

When did I say the fight was legendary because the fighters are legendary? I said the fight was legendary because the fight itself was legendary you illiterate novice child.

anyway that's kind of a paradox, legendary fighters make legendary fights, great fighters make great fights. the fighters make the fight.. what's the confusion?

[Parodius]

actually you're just full of ****.



When did I say the fight was legendary because the fighters are legendary? I said the fight was legendary because the fight itself was legendary you illiterate novice child.

anyway that's kind of a paradox, legendary fighters make legendary fights, great fighters make great fights. the fighters make the fight.. what's the confusion?

Still you're an idiot that doesn't make any difference, Marvin Hagler was my idol when I was kid. But I know difference between a 3 round fight & 10 round fight, Hagler dominated Hearns in round 2 & 3. Coralles & Castillos was a brawl for 10 rounds.

[scap]

I'll give Hagler-Hearns the slight edge.

Hagler-Hearns....is the BENCHMARK for ferocity & breathtaking excitement.

Since 1985....it's the fight all others are compared to....

Corrales-Castillo is an all-time great fight....certainly the best in a long time.

But.."Hagler-Hearns"......that fight meant so much, it has almost become a boxing cliche.

Fights and fighters are just like wine, they get better as the years go by in the eyes of the public.

Give the Castillo v. Corrales fight 5 or 10 years to ferment, let the tale/legend grow...also after 5 or 10 years have gone by and no one has seen a better fight then it will really ring true as to how great the fight actually was.

Hagler/Hearns was a benchmark as you said and it was an unfair one because it was almost impossible to equal, Castillo/Corrales is the new age benchmark and fans will slowly realize that this fight is not going to be equaled anytime soon.

Tough too pick but 10 rounds of war is 10 rounds of war.