WHICH ONE was the better FIGHT?

**Parodius** · 07-13-2005, 03:43 AM

Hagler is my favorite fighter of all time. That was the best 3 rounds I ever seen. But I have to go with Chico VS. Castillo. It went on for 10 rounds. So that's why I'm voting for Chico & Castillo. The best round I ever seen is probably round 1 Hagler & Hearns.

**Diablo** · 07-13-2005, 04:23 AM

JLC/Chico is my choice just for the simple fact that hagler/hearns was only 3 rnds.

**OliverNo1** · 07-13-2005, 04:25 AM

Im going for Cas/Cor as my boy won that one - as opposed to my boy losing the other!.

**Slipx** · 07-13-2005, 06:07 AM

if i was a mod, id delete u asshats accounts for saying castillo corrales just because it was more rounds

silly ****ing novices..

**The Golden Boy** · 07-13-2005, 06:10 AM

Originally posted by Slipx

if i was a mod, id delete u asshats accounts for saying castillo corrales just because it was more rounds

silly ****ing novices..

It wasn't just more rounds. It was more rounds that were every bit as good as the 3 in Hagler vs Hearns. Chico vs JLC > Hagler vs Hearns.

**Slipx** · 07-13-2005, 06:12 AM

i gave all you ****ing morons a well deserved dose of bad karma. im gonna jet to goto breakfast, later.

the reason hagler hearns was better is

nobody pussied out at the end spitting out their mouthpiece

way more elite moves were used, check out hearns using the ropes for leverage in round one,

hearns broke his right hand on haglers head in round one, that was an epic punch and proves he had an epic chin..not to mention add hella drama to the fight and show how brave and great hearns was for continuing to throw that right hand even after it was broke

it was war from the opening bell very much on a different level than jlc castillo

and finally i will add its mostly latino ****heads voting for jlc -corrales..you chumps are only voting because you want a mexican fight to go down as the all time great fight, you guys are morons.. you dont see me voting for the lesser fight just because their skin is lighter do you?

**Diablo** · 07-13-2005, 06:16 AM

Originally posted by Slipx

i gave all you ****ing morons a well deserved dose of bad karma. im gonna jet to goto breakfast, later.

ohhh nooo please don't do that!!!!

ARGGGGGG the dreaded bad karma

lol you tool.

**Parodius** · 07-13-2005, 06:20 AM

Originally posted by Slipx

if i was a mod, id delete u asshats accounts for saying castillo corrales just because it was more rounds

silly ****ing novices..

Your an idiot. 2 1/2 great rounds VS. 10 great rounds. Guess which one wins. This is coming from the biggest Hagler fan.

**Diablo** · 07-13-2005, 06:21 AM

Originally posted by Slipx

i gave all you ****ing morons a well deserved dose of bad karma. im gonna jet to goto breakfast, later.

the reason hagler hearns was better is

nobody pussied out at the end spitting out their mouthpiece

way more elite moves were used, check out hearns using the ropes for leverage in round one,

hearns broke his right hand on haglers head in round one, that was an epic punch and proves he had an epic chin..not to mention add hella drama to the fight and show how brave and great hearns was for continuing to throw that right hand even after it was broke

it was war from the opening bell very much on a different level than jlc castillo

and finally i will add its mostly latino ****heads voting for jlc castillo because they want a mexican fight to go down as the all time great fight, you guys are morons.. you dont see me voting for the lesser fight just because their skin is lighter do you?

I've just came to the conclusion that your Iwatch.

Oh no more bad karma from a another source! please stop!

WHICH ONE was the better FIGHT?