Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

May/Pac "negotiations" used to promote Pac-Cotto/Marg?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    i think its all part of the game.. arums moves about this all mixed up on promoting pacs next opponent since there is really nothing is goin on about the floyds fight with pac.. no nego no formal communication between floyds team and pacs team.. what can you do? arum is pacs promoter he knows what is up so u cant blame him thats his job..

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Phenom View Post
      so basically Arum have the date the place and the back up place for a Margarito fight what the hell are they going to negotiate with marg people other then if he would get 25 or 30% of the purse
      thank you. dude is a liar, claiming he wasnt in negotiations with them

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by carts View Post
        i think its all part of the game.. arums moves about this all mixed up on promoting pacs next opponent since there is really nothing is goin on about the floyds fight with pac.. no nego no formal communication between floyds team and pacs team.. what can you do? arum is pacs promoter he knows what is up so u cant blame him thats his job..
        so what i said is true and all this maypac "negotiations" whats complete bs

        this was to promote pac-cotto or marg

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by yesir View Post
          so what i said is true and all this maypac "negotiations" whats complete bs

          this was to promote pac-cotto or marg
          sure it must be true even i dont believe there is a nego or whatsoever between arum and floyds team.. as i pointed out in my previous posts floyds reasons can be either or one of these.. he wont fight pac if there is a cutoff, he will not fight him if its 50/50.. he will retire this year and fight again next year...
          Last edited by carts; 07-17-2010, 07:20 PM.

          Comment


          • #65
            Of course Arum used it to promote Pac-Cotto/Marg, it's so obvious. Even a blind dude can see it. But it doesn't mean that the negotiations are not real. Dela Hoya once had an interview that the fight is almost a reality, which means he knows about the negotiations. Schaeffer had no comment about the negotiations because he was trying to honor the gag order apparently, which kinda backfired if you ask me. If GBP didn't know anything 'bout the negotiations, they would've already commented about it back then.

            People gotta be rational and don't be blinded coz of their love for one fighter to see both sides of the story.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Dulcis_Scientia View Post
              Of course Arum used it to promote Pac-Cotto/Marg, it's so obvious. Even a blind dude can see it. But it doesn't mean that the negotiations are not real. Dela Hoya once had an interview that the fight is almost a reality, which means he knows about the negotiations. Schaeffer had no comment about the negotiations because he was trying to honor the gag order apparently, which kinda backfired if you ask me. If GBP didn't know anything 'bout the negotiations, they would've already commented about it back then.

              People gotta be rational and don't be blinded coz of their love for one fighter to see both sides of the story.
              schaeffer retracted DLH's statement. and you didnt hear anything else from either of them

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by carts View Post
                sure it must be true even i dont believe there is a nego or whatsoever between arum and floyds team.. as i pointed out in my previous posts floyds reasons can be either or one of these.. he wont fight pac if there is a cutoff, he will not fight him if its 50/50.. he will retire this year and fight again next year...
                i agree. the fact that arum didnt want to disclose any of the terms, tells me he didnt offer floyd anything floyd would accept

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by yesir View Post
                  schaeffer retracted DLH's statement. and you didnt hear anything else from either of them
                  That's not the point. To quote myself "People gotta be rational and don't be blinded coz of their love for one fighter to see both sides of the story."

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Dulcis_Scientia View Post
                    That's not the point. To quote myself "People gotta be rational and don't be blinded coz of their love for one fighter to see both sides of the story."
                    thats true. but there is a reason schaeffer retracted DLH's statements

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by yesir View Post
                      thats true. but there is a reason schaeffer retracted DLH's statements
                      Yes absolutely, I agree. But unless someone talks about that reason, we'll never truly know what that is. That's why I don't want to think more into it. And even though they say something, I think we can all agree that we can never really trust these promoters, TR or GBP. Promoters will always have an agenda.
                      Last edited by myCoCainE; 07-17-2010, 08:46 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP