Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why steal the WBC belt from Vitaliy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by guru
    how about unless you wanna make sure you have a fight on sept 24. what if the winner is cut or injured? then the fight gets pushed back to dec or later and vk will have to wait and stay out of the ring for a year or more?

    ....I think the winner will petition the WBC to extend the date after their fight. They are playing a game with that September 24th date and neither one intends to fight at that time. You will get another WBC ruling extending the fight just like you said. It could possibly even be a non visible injury excuse. They are gonna help keep VK even more inactive and make sure he comes into the ring rusty. Mark my words!!!

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Torino
      Your reputation as a proven liar and a fraud discredits your post.


      I said "your objective is not to debate the topic, but to get on the nerves of Klitschko fans and you will say or do anything to accomplish that goal including lie." Where did I say you succeeded? LOL
      It's the fact that I know you are a phony that makes it impossible for you to hurt my feelings. In order for you to hurt my feelings would require me to regard your opinion as credible. It's no secret that I don't. LOL



      If you don't care what I think then why do you respond?

      In regards to ignoring your post, I know your agenda. I know your objective is not to debate the topic, but to get on the nerves of Klitschko fans and you will say or do anything to accomplish that goal including lie. You have proven that countless times including in this very thread. Therefore you have no credibility and there is no point in discussing anything with you exept the fact that you are a fraud.

      Also, my avitar and my sig means that I'm a Klitschko fan, and THAT'S IT. If you make more out of it, well that suits your agenda doesn't it?

      You calling me a liar is realllllly rich.

      Newsflash: The biggest lies are the ones you tell yourself.

      You talk about credibility, and you have NONE. Anyone who reads one of your 'burrying your head in the sand' posts and takes one look at your avatar/signature shrine can see you're nothing more than a delusional raving fanatic.

      My other thread is a prime example. I asked a legit and valid question about people's feelings about Vitali being recognized as the ring champion and everyone was able to answer in a coherent and constructive manner except YOU.

      You immediatly went on the defensive (as you always do) and that speaks VOLUMES about you and your inner insecurities.

      I will continue to post as I see fit, and if you don't like me pointing out your biased and blinded fanaticism, you can put me on ignore and stick your head in the sand like Vdiary did.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by guru
        how about unless you wanna make sure you have a fight on sept 24. what if the winner is cut or injured? then the fight gets pushed back to dec or later and vk will have to wait and stay out of the ring for a year or more?
        Well, in that case, the challenger would be considered unavailable and he can go ahead and fight whomever he wants.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
          Here's my take,

          Let him keep the WBC title, and fight whoever he wants. If Rahman isn't available until later in the fall, so be it. Let him fight Maskiev, Brock or whoever.

          But strip the man of the Ring Belt.

          The biggest blow to the Ring belt's credibility was sanctioning Vitali vs Sanders for their belt, which in reccent years was gaining more and more credibility. Since then, he's fought once in 18th months, and it was agaisnt Danny Williams.

          I would have less of a problem with him fighting scrubs, and taking his time deciding what he wants to do if he just was a WBC title holder.

          But this whole Ring Belt, in conjunction with HBO, calling and touting Vitali Klitschko as "THE" Heavyweight champion is bull ****.

          Everyone is at square one at Heavyweight. All of them. None of them are particularly impressive, they've all fought soft opposition to a certian extent, and they're all too inactive.

          Vitali Klitschko NEVER should have been declaired the "Ring" Champion, and this is evident in the hard facts about who he's fought since, and what he's doing now.

          The "Ring" title should be held vacent until someone unifies the "WBC" WBA" and "IBF" titles. THAT'S where the liniage should continue.
          who cares what u think...

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by PRboxingfan
            Well, DK is telling everyone that the winner of Rock-Barrett will be ready to fight on Sept. 24th but the VK camp is still trying to make other fights. That is the reason why so many letters have been sent to the WBC by DK's lawyer (Bernstein), Rock, and Barrett. They want to fight on Sept. 24th, even if it's short time after their Aug 13th fight. So, if the mandatory says he'll be ready then there is no reason to make another fight unless you're scared.
            Hes not scared of Rahman he just wants to fight in September and I dont think the winner of Rahman Barret will ready nobody does.
            I think what they ought to do is cancel this bull****t fight between Barret and Rahman and have Rahman fight Klitschko on September 24th, that will be the easiest thing to do. Setting up an interim match was the dumbest thing they ever did....

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
              You calling me a liar is realllllly rich.

              Newsflash: The biggest lies are the ones you tell yourself.

              You talk about credibility, and you have NONE. Anyone who reads one of your 'burrying your head in the sand' posts and takes one look at your avatar/signature shrine can see you're nothing more than a delusional raving fanatic.

              My other thread is a prime example. I asked a legit and valid question about people's feelings about Vitali being recognized as the ring champion and everyone was able to answer in a coherent and constructive manner except YOU.

              You immediatly went on the defensive (as you always do) and that speaks VOLUMES about you and your inner insecurities.

              I will continue to post as I see fit, and if you don't like me pointing out your biased and blinded fanaticism, you can put me on ignore and stick your head in the sand like Vdiary did.
              Exposing you as the fraud you are is not "defensive", it's offensive against your objective. It's a service I'm providing to the new posters that haven't yet learned that your objective is not to debate the topic, but to get on the nerves of Klitschko fans and you will say or do anything to accomplish that goal including lie. I'm trying to spare them from trying to debate with you logically only to find that your objective is to get under their skin. This way, they get a red flag immediately that you have no credibility and will find out for themselves quicker. No matter what you say about me, they will always be questioning your credibility.

              Your crying and whining couldn't make it more obvious that I'm raining on your parade. You're pathetically, and constantly trying to defend yourself from the proven fact you are a fraud and liar. It's too late, you've let too much of the truth about you out, you are exposed.

              Your argument about me is that I'm a Klitschko fan, and you keep bringing up my avatar and sig. Big deal. No one cares about that but you. I'm a fan and that's why I have them there. It's no secret. If it offends you, ....GOOD!

              Your other thread, and whatever you say about any topic for that matter, is irrelevant. You only use the bits and pieces of the truth that fit your agenda. Therefore, anyone responding to your posts must take that into consideration and that you are already a proven to liar with no credibility.

              Actions speak louder than my avatar and sig, and your actions have already proven to the regulars on this site that you are a liar, a fraud, and your objective is not to debate the topic, but to get on the nerves of Klitschko fans and you will say or do anything to accomplish that goal. I will continue to make the newbies aware.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by PRboxingfan
                Well, in that case, the challenger would be considered unavailable and he can go ahead and fight whomever he wants.

                yeah, but rahman could start crying again and try to stop it... he'd try to force vk to wait til he's ready.... i really believe thats the game him and king are playing and they have no intention of fighting on the 24th... if you had a title shot would you really rush it a month after your next fight?

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Nautilus
                  By Scoop Malinowsky:

                  More Questions: The WBC is now under pressure to strip Vitali Klitschko of his WBC belt because he wants to defend against Calvin Brock in September before meeting the winner of the August showdown between Rahman-Barrett in December. Why are Rahman's people so eager to strip Vitali? They know Rock will automatically get the next WBC shot if he beats Barrett. Why can't they wait just a few months? Would they prefer to steal the WBC belt from Klitschko rather than actually have to get in a ring with him to try and take it the real way? And why would the WBC, if they strip Klitschko as they very likely will try to do, why would they forfeit the sanction fee of Klitschko-Brock? Is the reason because they feel obligated to cater to a promoter who fears the Klitschkos?

                  Why can't Rahman wait just a few months till December to fight Klitschko? It's not like he really deserves the shot anyway, look at his recent victories over subpar opposition.

                  The whole thing is beginning to smell like an all-out Don King assualt to freeze out the Klitschko from his heavyweight world.

                  Will Don King ever put himself in a position to match his fighters with either Klitschko with no options, no nothing? Would he ever put himself in the position to stand at a press conference after the Klitschkos have destroyed Brewster or Rahman or Byrd and stand there in the background like a secondary figure? What would he say then, Viva The Ukraine!??


                  Funny that you would say this as Wlad is also trying to use the courts to his advantage to do what he wants to do. Would you say that he has fought anyone worth mentioning in the last few fights (At least fights that he won) I guess Wlad going to court is also one of Don Kings Tricks too.

                  The reason that the rock has gone to the courts is because Klitchko has avoided him on three seperate occasions. what does he have to do to get the man in the ring? Point a gun at his head and have him marched off to the ring in the style of an old ******* wedding? Rahman has been patient and waited on three seperate occasions. For some reason Klitchko doesnt want to fight him and if Rahman sits still and makes no noise he will never get Klitchko in the ring. Klitchko would come up with every excuse in the book and never fight him.

                  He (Don King) put himself in a position to allow one of the klitchkos to be at a press conference after his fighter lost. Remember Brewster made Wlad turn into a tomatoe can. If Brewster had lost that fight then Don King would have had to concede the belt and props to Wlad but he failed miserably. It was a good attempt but for whatever reason he just didnt cut it.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP