Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why steal the WBC belt from Vitaliy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by DiegoFuego
    but we all know that's the reason that Wlad won't fight him
    all those other fights, the other guy deserved to win, usually came back and won in impressive fashion

    why did you put Toney Ruiz II on there? LOL
    That's just foolish - hate talk. Wlad won't fight him because he knocked him down, give me a break. Did you even watch the fight? If you did you were obviously wearing your anti-Klitschko glasses. Wlad was clearly off balance on the KD and got up at like the count of one to resume beating on Williamson. I'm not saying the KD didn't count, but please, to say that Wlad won't fight him because of that is a pretty weak argument.

    I know you can fabricate a more viable argument than that. There are more realistic points to which you can base your silly anti-Wlad campaign.

    I for one, don't see the point in Wlad fighting him again when he already beat him. As you Anti-Klitschko's like to say so often "a win is a win"

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by DiegoFuego
      but we all know that's the reason that Wlad won't fight him
      all those other fights, the other guy deserved to win, usually came back and won in impressive fashion

      why did you put Toney Ruiz II on there? LOL
      hey, greaseball..

      if you tell me the name of the prison youre in, ill make sure they give you a hell of a hard time..

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Torino
        2003-06-21 Lennox Lewis 24.5 months ago
        2003-12-06 Kirk Johnson 19 months ago
        2004-04-24 Corrie Sanders 14.5 months ago
        2004-12-11 Danny Williams 7 months ago

        As you can see, Vitali fought roughly every 6 months until his back injury that will result in only a 9 month layoff.

        Bozo has posted that Vitali only had one fight (with Danny Williams) in the last 18 months, as you can see, the truth is that Vitali has fought 2 fights in the last 14.5 months and 3 fights in the last 19 months.

        This is just one example of how fictitious Bozo's claims are. Knowing he is willing to lie about such easily obtainable information such as fight dates proves that everything he says must be questioned for it's credibility.

        This just further proves Bozo's objective is not to debate the topic, but to get on the nerves of Klitschko fans and he will say or do anything to accomplish that goal including lie. Now watch this scum bag say "I'm just a delusional Klitschko fan" even though I've provided facts that prove he's a fraud.


        You haven't proved anything other than that, as usual, you're a wounded little girl.

        I had the dates wrong in my post, I admit. I should have said he's fought TWICE in 18 months, which is a year and a half. And TAKE A LOOK at WHO he fought in those two fights.

        Its funny how out of everything I said in my post, you only looked at the dates.

        I will re post, and maybe you can read it again and try responding to the points I've made instead of issuing your tired respose "He's trying to make people upset" (just because it makes you upset.

        Let him keep the WBC title, and fight whoever he wants. If Rahman isn't available until later in the fall, so be it. Let him fight Maskiev, Brock or whoever.

        But strip the man of the Ring Belt.

        The biggest blow to the Ring belt's credibility was sanctioning Vitali vs Sanders for their belt, which in reccent years was gaining more and more credibility. Since then, he's fought once in 18th months, and it was agaisnt Danny Williams.

        I would have less of a problem with him fighting scrubs, and taking his time deciding what he wants to do if he just was a WBC title holder.

        But this whole Ring Belt, in conjunction with HBO, calling and touting Vitali Klitschko as "THE" Heavyweight champion is bull ****.

        Everyone is at square one at Heavyweight. All of them. None of them are particularly impressive, they've all fought soft opposition to a certian extent, and they're all too inactive.

        Vitali Klitschko NEVER should have been declaired the "Ring" Champion, and this is evident in the hard facts about who he's fought since, and what he's doing now.

        The "Ring" title should be held vacent until someone unifies the "WBC" WBA" and "IBF" titles. THAT'S where the liniage should continue.



        My point is that the Ring Magazine made a mistake in sanctioning Vitali vs Sanders for thier title, and that with who Vitali has fought since and what he's doing now, only underlines the current meidocrity of the Heavyweight division at present. There should NOT be a recognized champion until someone unifies the titles.

        As usual, you stick to calling me hateful and point out that I hurt your feelings.

        As you can see, more and more people are growing tired of Vitali's bull ****, and your feelings are going to get stompped on more and more as this farce continues to go on.

        Why don't you just post that quote from your signature a few more times?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Torino
          That's just foolish - hate talk. Wlad won't fight him because he knocked him down, give me a break. Did you even watch the fight? If you did you were obviously wearing your anti-Klitschko glasses. Wlad was clearly off balance on the KD and got up at like the count of one to resume beating on Williamson. I'm not saying the KD didn't count, but please, to say that Wlad won't fight him because of that is a pretty weak argument.

          I know you can fabricate a more viable argument than that. There are more realistic points to which you can base your silly anti-Wlad campaign.

          I for one, don't see the point in Wlad fighting him again when he already beat him. As you Anti-Klitschko's like to say so often "a win is a win"
          you consider getting headbutted a win obviously LOL

          so I guess everytime a fighter was in danger and got headbutted, he won the fight, right? EXPOSED

          Comment


          • #25
            and all of you are right. The Ring jumped the gun in naming Vitali the Heavyweight Champion when he did nothing but lose his 2 biggest fights to earn that right

            Comment


            • #26
              blowso,

              the way you make everyone out to be girls - over the net.. doesent that make you a ***it?

              are you in your fishnets now, getting attention from all the men..?

              huh, blowso, is that your game? sure it is.

              its elementary psychiatry, youre a ****ing ****sucker!

              i bet you send loveletters to don king aswell..

              Comment


              • #27
                The Ring giving Vitali the belt was complete bull**** and everyone knows it.

                First, Corrie Sanders went from being unranked to #3 as a result of the knockout of Wlad. As long as I have been reading Ring Mag (which is a LONG time) I don't ever remember a fighter getting such a big jump like that on the basis of one win.

                Second, the Ring's policy was always #1 fights #2 for the vacant belt. Sanders was #3 and they decided to change their policy so that in some circumstances #1 v. #3 was OK.

                I still think Vitali is the best HW in the world at the moment, until proven otherwise, but I completely lost respect for Ring when they pulled that bull****.

                Comment


                • #28






                  This message is hidden because
                  Michael Wittmann

                  is on your ignore list.





                  Last edited by Bozo_no no; 07-11-2005, 02:28 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                    This message is hidden because Michael Wittmann

                    is on your ignore list.
                    ahaha!

                    ..clever..

                    can you make your rabid red line make your ignore list aswell?

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by DiegoFuego
                      you consider getting headbutted a win obviously LOL

                      so I guess everytime a fighter was in danger and got headbutted, he won the fight, right? EXPOSED
                      Where did I say any of this?

                      These are your words, not mine.

                      You're speculating rather than quoting facts because there are no facts to back your claim.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP