Someone please make sense of this for me and explain.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DondiNeverLeft
    RedKmakes U happy lol
    • Mar 2010
    • 3299
    • 247
    • 31
    • 9,700

    #101
    History shows that there is nothing so easy to enslave and nothing so hard to emancipate as ignorance, hence it becomes the double enemy of civilization. By its servility it is the prey of tyranny, and by its credulity it is the foe of enlightenment. ~Lemuel K. Washburn

    Comment

    • Jack Napier
      Whores on Our Cul de Sac
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 8668
      • 812
      • 424
      • 16,030

      #102
      Originally posted by IdNod4u2
      History shows that there is nothing so easy to enslave and nothing so hard to emancipate as ignorance, hence it becomes the double enemy of civilization. By its servility it is the prey of tyranny, and by its credulity it is the foe of enlightenment. ~Lemuel K. Washburn
      what did you have for lunch today?

      Comment

      • DondiNeverLeft
        RedKmakes U happy lol
        • Mar 2010
        • 3299
        • 247
        • 31
        • 9,700

        #103
        “Nothing is as dangerous as an ignorant friend; a wise enemy is to be preferred.”

        Comment

        • Jack Napier
          Whores on Our Cul de Sac
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 8668
          • 812
          • 424
          • 16,030

          #104
          Originally posted by IdNod4u2
          “Nothing is as dangerous as an ignorant friend; a wise enemy is to be preferred.”
          what did you have for lunch today?

          Comment

          • DondiNeverLeft
            RedKmakes U happy lol
            • Mar 2010
            • 3299
            • 247
            • 31
            • 9,700

            #105
            Troll

            Comment

            • Jack Napier
              Whores on Our Cul de Sac
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 8668
              • 812
              • 424
              • 16,030

              #106
              Originally posted by IdNod4u2
              Troll
              what did you have for lunch today?

              Comment

              • Pullcounter
                no guts no glory
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 42582
                • 549
                • 191
                • 49,739

                #107
                Originally posted by IdNod4u2
                Let me get this straight...

                If Cotto accepts dumb Manny demands and catchweights- Cotto is dumb and Manny is great.

                Floyd makes demands and Manny does not accept- Floyd is scared, and Manny is great..lol WTF
                here's the difference:

                floyd has a history of ducking his toughest competition, while pac (except a few occasions) has fought a murder's row of opponents.

                SO Manny can make Demands as long as warriors are willing to accept them.
                they don't have to accept. it's not like arum is putting a gun to their heads.

                But if Floyd Makes demands and Manny(don't warrior up) Floyd is scared..lol
                like I said, floyd has a history of ducking.

                So it does not matter the demands? it matters who is making them? or who is accepting them(dummies not warriors)?
                the devil is in the details

                Comment

                • Pullcounter
                  no guts no glory
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 42582
                  • 549
                  • 191
                  • 49,739

                  #108
                  Originally posted by Jack Napier
                  what did you have for lunch today?
                  bwahahahhaah!

                  Comment

                  • AFighter4U
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 3576
                    • 63
                    • 0
                    • 9,768

                    #109
                    Originally posted by ForemanGrill
                    It's kind of sad. I've always liked watching Pacquiao fight, but the Pac fans on this board make it hard for me to even admit that, lest I be lumped in with them.
                    You should not allow the immaturity of others to influence you. Besides Pac has no control of what some of his fans do or say.

                    Comment

                    • liverkiller
                      Contender
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 216
                      • 11
                      • 1
                      • 6,616

                      #110
                      What has this forum become? Foodnetwork.com? This post is so true. I like Pacquiao but what is being said is true. Its a double standard...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP