Circumstantial fallacy......
What does fighter of the decade really mean?
If someone mentioned a fighter unknown to you and told you he was fighter of the decade, how it does necessarily imply a stellar skillset?
By looking at video tapes, It's clear Floyd has a greater all round skillet than Manny. No ones holding Floyd at higher standard. The likelihood of him gaining victory with less than ideal training is higher than Pacquiao.
Everyone needs a trainer, I'm not denying that.
But remember: Skills pay the bills!
Originally posted by LARRYX P4P#1
View Post
If someone mentioned a fighter unknown to you and told you he was fighter of the decade, how it does necessarily imply a stellar skillset?
By looking at video tapes, It's clear Floyd has a greater all round skillet than Manny. No ones holding Floyd at higher standard. The likelihood of him gaining victory with less than ideal training is higher than Pacquiao.
Everyone needs a trainer, I'm not denying that.
But remember: Skills pay the bills!
Comment