Does Floyd really have balls?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
prime for prime: who has more balls Oscar or PBF
Collapse
-
Originally posted by STRUGG View Postwhen is floyds prime???.................135..........140......... ....who did he beat that has the same pedigree as Ike and Tito???
The TIto I give you that. Even though Tito was having issue with making the weight. But, I give him major props for fighting him still.
Now the Quartey? And, the mysterious "cut"Last edited by jrosales13; 07-06-2010, 08:49 PM.
Comment
-
Oscar fought EVERYONE. If he was fighting today, he would not have people knocking him for not fighting the Pac's the Cotto's, the Marg's, the Williams, ect. Win or lose, Oscar fought for the love of the sport and for legacy. Floyd, while i love him, he only fights for money and himself.
As for who had a tougher road......Oscar by far. The people who say that Oscar lost every big fight, what does that mean? Usually that just refers to big PPV record setting fights. He did beat, Chavez, David Kamau, Jesse Leija, Gatti, Vargas, Rafael Ruelas, ect. Some people just hate him so much that they will nit pick any fight he won and find some way to discredit it due for their massive hate for him. Why hate him so much? He wasnt a trash talker. I did have him beating Ike, i had him a draw with Whitaker, though whoever got the call wouldn't have bothered me one bit. Lets be real, he BEAT TITO. He fought Shane 2x, while barely losing the 1st time, then getting robbed in the rematch. He fought one of the greatest MW ever in Hopkins.
That list alone, Floyds road comes nowhere close. I live Chico, but he was not a Mosley, a Trinidad, a Hopkins ect. Floyd i think is the better tech in the ring, but Oscar took more risk than almost anyone ever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by S IP U IR S xII View PostOscar fought EVERYONE. If he was fighting today, he would not have people knocking him for not fighting the Pac's the Cotto's, the Marg's, the Williams, ect. Win or lose, Oscar fought for the love of the sport and for legacy. Floyd, while i love him, he only fights for money and himself.
As for who had a tougher road......Oscar by far. The people who say that Oscar lost every big fight, what does that mean? Usually that just refers to big PPV record setting fights. He did beat, Chavez, David Kamau, Jesse Leija, Gatti, Vargas, Rafael Ruelas, ect. Some people just hate him so much that they will nit pick any fight he won and find some way to discredit it due for their massive hate for him. Why hate him so much? He wasnt a trash talker. I did have him beating Ike, i had him a draw with Whitaker, though whoever got the call wouldn't have bothered me one bit. Lets be real, he BEAT TITO. He fought Shane 2x, while barely losing the 1st time, then getting robbed in the rematch. He fought one of the greatest MW ever in Hopkins.
That list alone, Floyds road comes nowhere close. I live Chico, but he was not a Mosley, a Trinidad, a Hopkins ect. Floyd i think is the better tech in the ring, but Oscar took more risk than almost anyone ever.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Makavelli View Postwhat's better?
a win over a older pernell and JCC or a faded Mosely?
bigger challenge? facing an unbeaten Tito or unbeaten Chico?
i just stood up for that cross dressing ****...i feel sick
In all seriousness? This is a prime for prime question. And Oscar was in a position to fight whoever he wanted. Floyd couldn't draw flies to **** and was avoided like the plague because of it. Oscar gets credit for fighting Tito. But let's face it, he cherry picked every other fighter while Floyd had to fight Corrales just to get a deal with HBO
Comment
Comment