Pac loves fighting guys coming off L's...by why?

[letsgobrady]

Barrera had won 8 straight the first time he fought Pacquiao.

Hatton was coming off two wins.

Marquez had gone 5 years without a loss going into the first fight with Pacquiao, and had won 4 straight going into the second fight.

Cotto was coming off two wins.

Why the hell did I even justify this thread with a response?

hatton was comin off 2 wins against a small lazcano that looked like he was about tuo drop ricky and a paulie malignaggi that was lookin like ****

cotto was comin off of a win against micheal jennings and barley beat clottey in a contraversial fight where miguel lokked like the beat up fighter

[pbftxrs316]

answer what?


your thread title question of 'by why'?



you illiterate dumb****

lmao---and you know i can't even stand you mak---but he did put by why? i was like wtf does by why mean? anyway, fuunny ****---

but ts, i see your point though, and i agree? only coz people bash floyd for fighting these so called old guys, but these guys are coming off ko's and tko's----manny's opponents are coming off losses or tough wins or coming in at catchweights-----

[pbftxrs316]

Selective criticism.


That's like someone creating a thread asking, why doesn't Mayweather like fighting undefeated guys. After all he's only fought two his entire career, he didn't even fight a 3-0 or 6-0 guy in his pre-championship years. Just Corrales & Hatton.

Personally, I'd say it's coincidental just like Manny fighting a few guys coming off losses is coincidental.

when has manny ever fought anybody undefeated? and don't say he fought somebody who was 0-0----coz i'll spit in your face over the internet----lmao---