Prime for Prime: Who is more skilled- Judah or Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
Watch Judah fight, A) He has no straight left hand, he just baits and loads up uppercuts, B) He has a weak jab which he doesn't use well, C) His right hook is no where near as good as Pacquiao's.
So Technically, Pacquiao is better.Comment
-
When Judah gets overwhelmed he settles for the same counter left hook, or counter left uppercut. He backs straight up. He stays inside too long and gets caught with short punches. He fights with his hands low. He doesn't change his rhythm enough. I can go on and on.
Look at the common opponents. Did Manny ice Cotto and outclass Clottey based on durability alone? No.Comment
-
Hey it is all fantasy anyways. Is not like they're going to fight each other... So no way to prove right or wrong. Is all opinion based and I respect your opinion but I will disagree very strongly...Comment
-
The bolded is irrelevant to the thread.Comment
-
Comment
-
Anyway... I'll tell you this. If him and Manny were to fight, I'd lay a substantial bet on Zab to win, because the odds I'd be getting would be awesome, and I think Zab should actually be the favorite in that fight.Comment
-
Comment
-
people see a black fighter dipping and moving and automatically think he's more skilled.
Judah counter punches and very rarely goes forward, that alone makes him look more skilled than he really is, Pacquiao does all his stuff whilst standing right infront of his opponent.
He has a better arsenal by far, footwork, boxing smarts. To say Pacquiao is better than Judah at everything is not a strech.Comment
-
I don't particularly agree with the bolded. It's not the variety of punches(as Zab could throw every punch in the book "effectively"), it is more so the volume of the punches that separate the two. Pac has a greater punch output than Judah, not a greater variety. Unless you want to count the Clottey "double" punch that Pac has in his arsenal.
The bolded is irrelevant to the thread.Comment
Comment