Why would you just blame one fighter if the Pac Floyd fights falls apart again?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pacquiao'd
    Banned
    • Mar 2010
    • 11948
    • 612
    • 153
    • 12,591

    #21
    Originally posted by jri9d0
    You get no argument from me in that regard, but hey, with this much money involved a promoter needs to milk the hype for what it's worth and have a stand-by option available. In this case it's two fighters from his own stable who wouldn't make any bones in signing the dotted line in the event that plan "A" (Floyd fight) doesn't come about.
    but again, they talk more about fighting cotto and marg. than floyd.

    so its shows they are more interested in fighting someone within their own stable than fighting floyd. then they are trying to say floyd is holding up negotiations. that floyd is the trouble maker or whatever when floyd hasnt said not a word, even his team is silent.

    team pac think they are cleaver/smart and they really arent the brightest stars in the sky. actaully, the dimmest

    Comment

    • jri9d0
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 5107
      • 190
      • 0
      • 12,323

      #22
      Originally posted by yesir
      but again, they talk more about fighting cotto and marg. than floyd.

      so its shows they are more interested in fighting someone within their own stable than fighting floyd. then they are trying to say floyd is holding up negotiations. that floyd is the trouble maker or whatever when floyd hasnt said not a word, even his team is silent.

      team pac think they are cleaver/smart and they really arent the brightest stars in the sky. actaully, the dimmest
      Maybe that's why Arum is talking up a storm as these two fighters as a first option because of the negotiations on Floyd's part being so silent. I can't fault Floyd for that because negotiations shouldn't have been so public in the first place.

      That said, negotiations from BOTH parties should have not dragged out so long because of inability to agree to details of a contract.

      I think both are acting on a pre-Madonna whim and holding the fans sentiment captive.

      Comment

      • manmoon
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • May 2010
        • 56
        • 0
        • 15
        • 6,118

        #23
        Originally posted by yesir
        floyd compromised more than pac back in december and pac still walked. so how is it both of their faults?

        at some point in time, fingers have to be pointed at the guy who actaully walked away. especially when pac is now wanted to accept the terms he orginally walked away from that are no longer on the table, might i add

        saying its "both of their faults" is a copout

        this time around, floyd holds all the cards, he doesnt have to compromise.
        The post that you're responding to was making reference to someone's point that the defamation lawsuit is both of their fault ... i.e. Floyd and company for making statements, and Pac for filing the suit.

        Comment

        • mathed
          molṑn labé
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 54549
          • 2,741
          • 2,984
          • 224,675

          #24
          Everyone involved with the negotiations is to blame

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP