Originally posted by GranTorino
WBC orders Vitaliy to fight Rahman/Barrett winner
Collapse
-
Originally posted by RenegadeIf you're going to be a reporter, you ought to quote your source.
Comment
-
-
-
if the wbc is ordering vk to fight the winner and they know it probably cant take place til nov/dec, why cant VK fight a tune up in sept???? i dont see the harm, other than VK losing, in which case you could place with whoever beat him...Comment
-
Originally posted by The Fixvit dont want it with rahman, he'll give up the wbc and rahman will be the recognized champ.....again
hasim will unify against ruiz in a rematch where rahmna will be focused and in shape
Rahman will fly again ... out of the ring.Comment
-
So let me get this straight, in April or May the WBC ordered Vitali to defend his title on Sept, 24th against the winner the of Rahman/Barrett fight.
Later, Vitali said he was going to defend his title on Sept, 24th against the winner of the Rahman/Barrett fight.
Then all the roomers started to fly about Vitali taking another fight. Though Vitali and the WBC said nothing.
Again, on June 2nd Vitali said he was going to defend his title on Sept, 24th against the winner of the Rahman/Barrett fight and that he would not give up the WBC belt to take another fight. He said he had to defend his title before he planned for another fight.
Then all the roomers started to fly again about Vitali taking another fight. Even though Vitali and the WBC still said nothing.
Now the WBC orders Vitali to defend his title on Sept, 24th against the winner the of Rahman/Barrett fight.
So what's the news?
Maybe now we can stop all this "who's he gonna fight" BS.Comment
-
Originally posted by NautilusWBC orders Vitaliy to fight Rahman/Barrett winner on Sep 24 ...
This means no Toney or Brock fight.
Good, that's the way it should be. ****. I cant believe someone like Maskeav could be in the same sentence as heavyweight title fight.Comment
Comment