Floyds "tax issue" for the year, for possibly not fighting in 2010?

[Horus]

Why are you reaching?

Why are you defending just to defend?

Why not just say, you're right... the tax situation really doesn't effect him?


Because you defend blindly... and when you defend blindly, you look like an idiot.

1. How am I reaching, when I clearly based my argument around facts?
2. I can same the same about you
3. Because in this circumstance we can not say how the tax situation would effect him, because we dont have all the details. Based on the details we do have, and Mayweather past history. If one thing is true about this whole thing is that taxes do effect him. So I do not see how this case is any different.

If you read all my response you would know, that I even admitted that arguments for his reasoning for taxes may very well backfire. If you read the whole thing you would have notice that.

idiot, I am not.
in the words of Rakim
"don't sweat the technique"

[Horus]

And as you have clearly indicated in this thread when discussing Floyd and taxes, is that not everyone thinks logically.

And that's all I needed to hear from you.

No, it isn't a valid argument.

It's a valid argument to those who follow others blindly and will find some rhyme or reason as to why they are right.

Comparing Floyds 40 million dollar paychecks to a guy making car payments

So Reed,
let me ask you a question, be honest.

How you ever supported one of Roy Jones jr decisions even though it was illogical?

and If you have, was you following him blindly?


lol

[chinoy]

Jesus H. Christ.....

i used to tutor elementary kids when I was in high school and you remind me of a kid who inspite of explaining everything in simple terms, charts, pictures etc STILL could NOT understand basic division and multiplication.....

wait, aside from Vivek W., are you the same ***** who kept insisting that the last decade was Jan 1, 2000 to Dec 31,2010?

Great way to avoid the point, and great to not aknowledge you made a mistake in your last post by thinking I was talking in generalities.

The point once again is dont completly dismiss the argument, because the argument does have some validation because it has commonality with people in our society.

Do you understand that what I am trying to explain to you in the clearest terms possible is that ultimatley what Mayweather is doing very common if you apply the idea of it to everyday life.

**** I could write a list of illogical **** that we all day everyday, but guess
what? it doesnt matter because People are not logical creatures.
that is a fact!!

So once again my whole point in this matter as it relates to taxes, something we all hate to pay which has been pointed out numerous things in this thread.

Mayweather and his team have a valid argument what it comes to their distain of taxes that shouldnt be dismiss in a arbitrary way.

[THE REED]

1. How am I reaching, when I clearly based my argument around facts?
2. I can same the same about you
3. Because in this circumstance we can not say how the tax situation would effect him, because we dont have all the details. Based on the details we do have, and Mayweather past history. If one thing is true about this whole thing is that taxes do effect him. So I do not see how this case is any different.

If you read all my response you would know, that I even admitted that arguments for his reasoning for taxes may very well backfire. If you read the whole thing you would have notice that.

idiot, I am not.
in the words of Rakim
"don't sweat the technique"

I like you as a person Horus, but your argument holds as much water as a pasta strainer.

It doesn't matter how many words you use, how you highlight it or color it... or how much insanely terrible grammar you use.

Nothing will change the fact that, he will pay the same percentage and more next year as opposed to this.


Whether he makes 20 million, 100 million, or 625 billion... he is going to be taxed 35%.

The more he fights, the more he will NET.

[THE REED]

So Reed,
let me ask you a question, be honest.

How you ever supported one of Roy Jones jr decisions even though it was illogical?

and If you have, was you following him blindly?


lol

No... I've called Roy a moron countless times.

If I don't agree with something he says or does, I have no shame in making it vocal.

[Horus]

Jesus H. Christ.....

i used to tutor elementary kids when I was in high school and you remind me of a kid who inspite of explaining everything in simple terms, charts, pictures etc STILL could NOT understand basic division and multiplication.....

wait, aside from Vivek W., are you the same ***** who kept insisting that the last decade was Jan 1, 2000 to Dec 31,2010?

So u think Vivek W is an idiot?

[Horus]

No... I've called Roy a moron countless times.

If I don't agree with something he says or does, I have no shame in making it vocal.

So are you telling me you never support a Roy Decision in his entire career that was illogical?

you only supported his logical decisions..



yes or no answer would be fine for that question..if you dont want to go into details

[THE REED]

So are you telling me you never support a Roy Decision in his entire career that was illogical?



yes or no answer would be fine for that question..if you dont want to go into details

This isn't about ROY... or about ME as a fan of Roy.

Stay on TOPIC.

This is about Floyds ILL excuse of "taxes" as to why he doesn't want to fight.

You aren't going to turn the argument around on me.

Sorry.


Just leave the thread bro... you have nothing else to offer.

Thanks and sianara.

[Horus]

I like you as a person Horus, but your argument holds as much water as a pasta strainer.

It doesn't matter how many words you use, how you highlight it or color it... or how much insanely terrible grammar you use.

Nothing will change the fact that, he will pay the same percentage and more next year as opposed to this.


Whether he makes 20 million, 100 million, or 625 billion... he is going to be taxed 35%.

The more he fights, the more he will NET.

I think I agreed with the statement that the more he makes the more he will get taxed. Even though it is the same percentage.



Thats was not my point. You never address my point, you just keep arguing your point. and arguing your point. When you Address my point than maybe
we can get somewhere.

[THE REED]

I think I agreed with the statement that the more he makes the more he will get taxed. Even though it is the same percentage.



Thats was not my point. You never address my point, you just keep arguing your point. and arguing your point. When you Address my point than maybe
we can get somewhere.

Yeah, you argue your own **** too.

The more he fights, the more he nets.

Period.