should ther be stricter testing in boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Picazo
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 1119
    • 22
    • 1
    • 7,698

    #21
    Originally posted by killacash
    What do u mean as long as it dont interfere? Of course it will interfere, who would want to fight a boxer that just tested dirty before fight night. Once the stricter testing is implemented, Yes it will be a drought of fights cause the test will weed out the dirty fighters which will be almost the majority of boxers. Just think about it, people think Pacquiao is su****ious then what about the boxers that got caught that didnt even raise a red flag(JCC Jr, and Ali Funeka). Once they step it up to USDA or even 365 all year round testing, you will see all those spectacular boxers and fights we all fell in love with were just souped up animals.
    as long as it doesnt interfere with the fighting...the boxing. think about what im saying. as long as you dont have the fights being cut down from 1000 a year to 500, as long as you dont have things changing. from 3 minute rounds to 2. if you change something like this that for the most part has worked, then should you change other things that have worked? maybe youll want to stop the praying in the ring beacause it gives you an unfair advantage....as long as it doesnt affect the fighting as a collective whole...obviously im not talking about one or two specific cases..whats important is the fighting and the enjoyment that the viewers receive.
    And on a sidenote we all know who brought this whole thing up....lil man Floyd. yeah, the mans an incredible talent. theres no arguing that. he went 39-0 with no gripe, with no complaining. tell me why that is? no one seems to bring this up...why? is it because pacquiao is beating dudes left and right? or is it because hes doing it in a way he couldnt. why did no one ever accuse mayweather of using steroids? when he moved up in weight and still couldnt be beat, how come no one said anything? on one fighting floyd ever asked him to be tested...they had no reason to doubt that his skills were god given, did they? but floyd is different, right? hes the "special" one with the god given ability. hes the one that gets to call all the shots. everyone abides by his rules all the people agree with the opinion of one man. why didnt anyone else accuse manny od steroids before floyd? not even marquez who had a bitter rivalry accused him until floyd did...its hysterical. at least to me it is...because if anyone whould accuse him it would be floyd. theeman with the self procalimed god given ability would be the man to doubt another who claims he has the same god given ability. funny, people anre funny.

    Comment

    • B.U.R.N.E.R
      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 30197
      • 1,346
      • 400
      • 47,475

      #22
      ^^^ This poster doesnt understand the concept of "better" drug testing.

      Comment

      • Picazo
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 1119
        • 22
        • 1
        • 7,698

        #23
        Originally posted by No Ceilings
        ^^^ This poster doesnt understand the concept of "better" drug testing.
        and im sure you do, with your superior undestanding of everything.....

        Comment

        • IIIX JACK XIII
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jun 2010
          • 138
          • 12
          • 11
          • 6,368

          #24
          Originally posted by braddman
          Yep, as long as Mayweather isn't the one making the rules, there should be stricter testing. I'll never understand why Mayweather wants Pac tested, but every other person he fights, and every person fighting on his undercard don't have to be tested. That's my outlook on things.
          im not talking about mayweather pacquiao, im talking about stricter testing for all fights.

          Comment

          • jasbar
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 743
            • 40
            • 39
            • 6,966

            #25
            No, the current testing is just fine. No need to over do things.

            Comment

            • Vito Corleone
              Banned
              • May 2010
              • 1631
              • 108
              • 45
              • 1,881

              #26
              Originally posted by braddman
              Yep, as long as Mayweather isn't the one making the rules, there should be stricter testing. I'll never understand why Mayweather wants Pac tested, but every other person he fights, and every person fighting on his undercard don't have to be tested. That's my outlook on things.
              Floyd PUBLICLY stated that every fight from now on that he engages in will have enhanced testing.

              That kills your (attempted) point.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP