Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Cotto II Would Be at a Catch-Weight, Says Koncz

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • spoonwars
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 2635
    • 151
    • 69
    • 8,813

    #21
    damn the time's over for small man this and that. you're argued to be at the top of the lb-4-lb list in a rematch against a man you already demolished at a catch weight. give him a chance to prove catch weight had nothing to do with the first beating.

    a catch weight MIGHT only do some justice for a next time if it's for the middleweight title and martinez

    Comment

    • Story
      Am I free to go ?
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 5304
      • 103
      • 168
      • 11,684

      #22
      Why even mention Cotto though ? Roach said he's sure Manny will agree to all of the terms for the Mayweather fight.

      Comment

      • Vegan101
        Do you have Grey Poupon?
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 2093
        • 1,065
        • 1,576
        • 9,181

        #23
        catchweight or not the result will be the same ****.

        Comment

        • 17scenes
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 182
          • 8
          • 0
          • 6,214

          #24
          Originally posted by T.I.
          He's officially had one (1) catchweight. Same as Floyd. Difference is, Manny came in the contracted weight.

          And I ain't even supporting this bull**** of a fight if it's a catchweight.

          Has Floyd ever won a "title" at a catchweight?

          Thats the issue here.

          If it was a non-title fight I could care less at what weight they fight.

          But I just think that if a champ won his belt at a certain weight, he should be able to defend it at that same weight. As a challenger for the belt, dont come in there trying to weaken the champ, or "even the odds" because you are smaller. You want the belt go and beat the champion at his best.

          Thats how I see it, but not just particularly for Manny, but in general for the sport of boxing.

          Comment

          • infamous larryx
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 10881
            • 512
            • 265
            • 1,565

            #25
            Originally posted by Vegan101
            catchweight or not the result will be the same ****.
            so....why even mention the fight??

            Comment

            • M.I Truth ?
              Truth Personified
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2006
              • 3204
              • 142
              • 216
              • 9,854

              #26
              Its like this dude wants to make his fighter look bad.

              Comment

              • RubenSonny
                Lagos State of Mind
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 4747
                • 287
                • 388
                • 11,330

                #27
                the prospect of pac-cotto rematch at 154 got me a little interested.....catchweight...not so much.

                Comment

                • mushahadeen
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 7964
                  • 384
                  • 321
                  • 8,800

                  #28
                  O.M.G. No more ***** catchweights!! Unless he's fighting like...Vitali Klitchko or something, NO CATCHWEIGHTS for a guy 1 inch taller than you!

                  Cotto should be like that guy from Seinfeld "No rematch for you!"

                  [IMG]http://www.teesforall.com/images/Seinfeld_Soup_****_Blue_Shirt.jpg[/IMG]

                  Comment

                  • COVID-19
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 13896
                    • 609
                    • 642
                    • 319,524

                    #29
                    Catchweight?.............What a load of bull!

                    Comment

                    • damned1974
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 3981
                      • 472
                      • 323
                      • 16,857

                      #30
                      Does anyone see a pattern here???? Another attempt to screw Cotto around with a catchweight fight for HIS belt... not to mention team Pac is already scouting other opponents while supposedly negotiating with Floyd.This **** is getting predictable....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP