Originally posted by Clayton Bigsby
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
You're an Un-Patriotic Traitor if you are American and want Mayweather to lose to Pac
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostYou have no clue what I or that clown jR is talking about lol... You sent me an IM only because I ****ted on you in another thread a while back with your sorry pathtic ******* outlooks lol...
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua View Postdavid haye fought john ruiz and guess who i went for because im a fan of the fighter?? the hayemaker.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostThis has nothing to do with Floyd lol... He made that pathetic comment *******. The WBC has done it's best to keep trail of the "lineal title" and everyone JRosales named as a lineal champion held the WBC title-coincidence lol. The lineal champion talk goes back way before Floyd even became champion lol...
I so far from a "*******" it's not even funny...I can see you are just here to "E-Beef" though, so have at it. Also, the fact that you add "lol" after every thing you say, sort of just highlights that fact that you are a joke (lol).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostYou didn't get you point across lol... Your outlook on the lineal champion is not real lol... When i talk lineal champion, you can trace the title as far back to its origin of who first won it...not some Ring mag super champion googled mess that you inserted into our argument that was invented when lol... Every champ you said Pac beat held the WBC title lol... Coincidence lol... Hypocrite lol... Your simple ass "Floyd is the WBC champ so you think the WBC title is lineal" weak ass argument is ass lol...
Second, I have never counted the Ring title as lineal title. Roy Jones for years was the Ring LHW champ. However, Dariusz M was the lineal champ.
Until a few months ago The Ring had the Flyweight championship as vacant. However, the Kameda, Wonjongkam, and Naito held the lineal flyweight title when that had been traced back since the 70's when Canto claimed it. Even though The Ring had it vacant there was a lineal champion.
Right now The Ring has the WW title vacant. However, Floyd is the lineal champion of the WW division. Even though he has no belts.
The Ring and Lineal are not the same thing. I never said it was. So I don't know where you got that from. However, you said that the WBC=Lineal. Why is that?
Pac did not held the WBC title at 126 nor at 140 where I said he won the lineal title. So how am I being a hypocrite? Where is the Coincidence?
And, there is a thread where I asked you why do you think the WBC title=Lineal. And, your answer was "B/C Floyd said is the official belt."
So now who has the weak ass argument?
Comment
-
I'm an American and I'm rooting for Mayweather to beat Pacquiao, but it has little to do with the fact Floyd is American. I root for fighters for what they do in the ring, not where they are from in all cases. I do tend to root for Puerto Rican fighters because I was born there, but I have root against Puerto Ricans as well. At the end of the day, where they are from doesn't mean much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostFirst of all when I told Handspeed about my point. I meant my point about the thread topic. Not about you dumb **** that you're on.
Second, I have never counted the Ring title as lineal title. Roy Jones for years was the Ring LHW champ. However, Dariusz M was the lineal champ.
Until a few months ago The Ring had the Flyweight championship as vacant. However, the Kameda, Wonjongkam, and Naito held the lineal flyweight title when that had been traced back since the 70's when Canto claimed it. Even though The Ring had it vacant there was a lineal champion.
Right now The Ring has the WW title vacant. However, Floyd is the lineal champion of the WW division. Even though he has no belts.
The Ring and Lineal are not the same thing. I never said it was. So I don't know where you got that from. However, you said that the WBC=Lineal. Why is that?
Pac did not held the WBC title at 126 nor at 140 where I said he won the lineal title. So how am I being a hypocrite? Where is the Coincidence?
And, there is a thread where I asked you why do you think the WBC title=Lineal. And, your answer was "B/C Floyd said is the official belt."
So now who has the weak ass argument?
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostAnd, there is a thread where I asked you why do you think the WBC title=Lineal. And, your answer was "B/C Floyd said is the official belt."Last edited by Frank Ducketts; 06-27-2010, 05:00 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostYou are one sorry mofo lol... I'm old school, and you are a youngen. When you trace the titles as far back as they go, you will see that the WBC has picked up on lineal title as other organizations have tried. You weren't watching boxing then so you don't remember when Barrera beat Morales for the title and then dropped the title. PAc was just starting to become big lol... You are a @#!@$! sham lol...
WBC does not = lineal....
There are many examples where I could give that the WBC champ is not the lineal champ. Or vice versaLast edited by jrosales13; 06-27-2010, 05:04 PM.
Comment
Comment