Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

You're an Un-Patriotic Traitor if you are American and want Mayweather to lose to Pac

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Most of my favorite fighters come from all over the world, the only thing that matters is what they do in the ring. Nationality and patriotism should have nothing to do with respect.

    Comment


    • I dont support Mayweather Jr. because he's ****sexual and Im not...

      Heterosexual people have to stick together!!!!!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View Post
        You are a ****ing moron lol... We are tracing the title as far back as John L. Sullivan days as a fighter in all divisions...even the later invented jr. divisions lol... You are talking about some Ring mag recently invented this decade 'lineal' super/real champ' attempt at creating 1 champion lol...
        ohh my god....

        wow. just wow.


        in the words of rank ducketts, lol....

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View Post
          Jrosales lol...don't make too much out of my mistake as in the link that you brought up shows that I wrote that PAc beat Barrera for his lineal title.
          Yes he beat Barrera for the lineal title that Barrera got from beating Hamed

          Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
          ask him to put a sentence together without 'lol' ...i bet you he gets a nosebleed
          He won't be able to do it.

          Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View Post
          You are a ****ing moron lol... We are tracing the title as far back as John L. Sullivan days as a fighter in all divisions...even the later invented jr. division lol...
          The lineal title dates back to the Pedroza in 83. It went Pac>Barrera>Hamed>Vazquez>Rojas>Park>Esparragoza>Cruz>McGuigan>Pedroza

          And, the reason it goes back to 83 was cuz Salvador Sanchez the lineal featherweight champ died in 82. So that lineage was broken until Pedroza beat Lockridge in 83.
          Last edited by jrosales13; 06-27-2010, 05:19 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
            Dariusz M was the lineal champ and didn't have the WBC belt.

            For years Lennox was the WBC champ that title he got that Bowe threw in the trash. But, that title didn't mean lineal Bowe was still the lineal champ and Lennox won the WBC title but wasn't lineal. He didn't become Lineal until he beat Shannon Briggs who beat Foreman for the title

            And, I can give you more examples.
            Try to look at it without the titles being stripped or thrown in the garbage lol...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
              Yes he beat Barrera for the lineal title that Barrera got from beating Hamed



              He won't be able to do it.



              The lineal title dates back to the Pedroza in 83. It went Pac>Barrera>Hamed>Vazquez>Rojas>Park>Esparragoza>Cruz>McGuigan>Pedroza

              And, the reason it goes back to 83 was cuz Salvador Sanchez the lineal featherweight champ died in 82. So that lineage was broken until Pedroza beat Lockridge in 83.
              Finally we agree. But we aren't just talking about this division are we lol... Every title can be traced back to it's origin in every division, and if you can go backwards and find the first titlist, then you can go forward and finds its latest champion. That's what the world "lineal" in lineal champion means to me.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View Post
                Finally we agree. But we aren't just talking about this division are we lol... Every title can be traced back to it's origin in every division, and if you can go backwards and find the first titlist, then you can go forward and finds its latest champion. That's what the world "lineal" in lineal champion means to me.
                Exactly and doesn't mean WBC...

                Hell the WBC is not even the oldest title.

                The oldest title is the WBA that use to be known as the NBA.

                But, neither=lineal.

                WBC has nothing to do with being lineal. Sometimes the lineal champ is the WBO, WBA, IBF, IBO, or WBC, or sometimes like in Floyd case right now has not title.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View Post
                  Dumbass lol... I was exploiting your visual lies lol... I know that you are just a ugly, fat over weight Filipino sick of Floyd's fans lol...



                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                    Exactly and doesn't mean WBC...

                    Hell the WBC is not even the oldest title.

                    The oldest title is the WBA that use to be known as the NBA.

                    But, neither=lineal.

                    WBC has nothing to do with being lineal. Sometimes the lineal champ is the WBO, WBA, IBF, IBO, or WBC, or sometimes like in Floyd case right now has not title.
                    We all know the WBC title isn't the oldest title. I don't like arguing simple points that we all know. My point has always been that if you trace the title back as far as it goes without deaths or champions dropping titles or titles being stripped titles, and then go forward to today...the WBC has done this, and they have done this well before Floyd was born!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Killa Killa View Post
                      It wasn't the biggest fight in the history of the sport though...Pac-May is on the otherhand...won't be another fight of this caliber for many years....
                      yeah its not but what im saying his it doesnt matter where your from or whatever. if your a fan of whoever then be a fan. **** all that other ****.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP