Comments Thread For: Conte: Mayweather Justified To Test "Su****ious" Pacquiao
Collapse
-
-
Mosley never admitted he was taking that stuff till his Balco testimony got leaked then he had to come clean.Its funny to hear how he admitted he was on roids so he should get a pass.A cheater is a cheater no matter what.those are not the only boxers who moved up in weight & became successful. mosley admitted to steroid use to a grand jury, roy, holyfield, & toney failed drug tests. what does pacquiao have to do with them? he aint never failed a drug test & has no association with victor conte or steroids.
is pac using better steroids than them? why because floyd says the philippines have the best peds? no that would be america. philippines havent even won a gold medal.
we should look at floyd. both pac & floyd started at 106. floyd went all the way to 154 while pac at 147.Comment
-
how is it warranted?
i thought pac chose the weakest & sorriest 135 pounder in david diaz?
i thought oscar was a shot old weight drained zombie?
i thought miguel cotto was a catch weight drained damaged by margarito fighter?
i thought the ricky hatton win was vs a past prime chin cracked & blue print showed by floyd?
yet he's doing something out of this world so he must be a steroid user?
GTFO.Comment
-
There is no real hard evidence which can be used to accuse Pacquaio in the first place. He takes the default position of being a clean athlete. Positive real hard evidence has to be provided to put is default position in doubt.
It's up to the accusers to provide positive proof, not for the accused to bend to the accusers demands.
You don't ask pacquiao to prove that he's NOT on steroids, you as the accuser has to provide postive evidence to create reasonable doubts. Negative proofs are cannot be used.
Nowhere in Victor Conte's rambling did I see this evidence being presented. All he could come up with is circumstantial; evidence which is much less credible.
real hard evidence >> circumstantial evidenceLast edited by Vadrigar.; 06-25-2010, 02:36 AM.Comment
-
Manny's not in Floyd's level ... but yet all Floyd wants to do is "level" the playing field..how is it warranted?
i thought pac chose the weakest & sorriest 135 pounder in david diaz?
i thought oscar was a shot old weight drained zombie?
i thought miguel cotto was a catch weight drained damaged by margarito fighter?
i thought the ricky hatton win was vs a past prime chin cracked & blue print showed by floyd?
yet he's doing something out of this world so he must be a steroid user?
GTFO.
Comment
-
Conte is very knowledgeable in his field, but he knows nothing about boxing I suppose.
"Moving up five or six weight classes and becoming faster." Who is he talking about? It's definately not Pacquiao.Comment
-
true that.....!!!there is no real hard evidence which can be used to accuse pacquaio in the first place. He takes the default position of being a clean athlete. Positive real hard evidence has to be provided to put is default position in doubt.
It's up to the accusers to provide positive proof, not for the accused to bend to the accusers demands.
You don't ask pacquiao to prove that he's not on steroids, you as the accuser has to provide postive evidence to create reasonable doubts. Negative proofs are cannot be used.
Nowhere in victor conte's rambling did i see this evidence being presented. All he could come up with is circumstantial; evidence which is much less credible.
real hard evidence >> circumstantial evidenceComment
-
so pac can dominate & make more money vs the guy that beat shane mosley.
shane took & passed the test but that wasnt gonna make him NOT BE 39 years old & 1 year & 5 months inactive when he faced floyd.Comment
Jizz on my face
Comment