People are saying that Pac never failed a test but.....

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #121
    Originally posted by flipside
    you need proof before a search warrant can be granted
    No, not proof - reasonable cause. Any suspect whose story keeps changing, is contradictory and at times a downright fallacy would be reasonable cause.

    Comment

    • fcastro1
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 3770
      • 89
      • 7
      • 10,064

      #122
      Originally posted by yesir
      just as i thought, you STILL dont understand "50/50 and 14 days was taken off the table by floyd"
      Excuse!!!!

      Comment

      • MayMafia
        Banned
        • Apr 2010
        • 180
        • 25
        • 0
        • 240

        #123
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        No, not proof - reasonable cause. Any suspect whose story keeps changing, is contradictory and at times a downright fallacy would be reasonable cause.
        False, ****** Matlock...

        For arrests and warrants, probable cause is needed which "information sufficient to warrant a prudent person's belief that the wanted individual had committed a crime (for an arrest warrant)"...

        Refusing to be searched, is not reasonable su****ion...

        Comment

        • andrew14
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 581
          • 101
          • 105
          • 7,755

          #124
          Originally posted by da beatdown
          Neither did Shane Mosley,Barry Bonds,Mark McGuire or Marion Jones. In this day and age when so many athletes are/were performing at unprecedented levels, one cant help but to wonder. I hope he takes the blood test and it comes out clean.Thats not the end-all-be-all but at least its a step in the right direction.
          ***** like you is a scientist.

          go get a life... let the one who understand the meaning of PED do their job.

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #125
            Originally posted by MayMafia
            False, ****** Matlock...

            For arrests and warrants, probable cause is needed which "information sufficient to warrant a prudent person's belief that the wanted individual had committed a crime (for an arrest warrant)"...

            Refusing to be searched, is not reasonable su****ion...
            Yes. Lying will get you searched. So is contradicting yourself.

            BTW, what is a "****** Matlock?"

            Comment

            • MayMafia
              Banned
              • Apr 2010
              • 180
              • 25
              • 0
              • 240

              #126
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              Yes. Lying will get you searched. So is contradicting yourself.

              BTW, what is a "****** Matlock?"
              Lying about what??? Not wanting to get searched/tested???? You have shyt backwards...

              A cop stops you and accuses you of being drunk with no evidence, no probable cause, reasonable su****ion, nothing.... Then the cop says take this breathalizer test.... You say yes, then no, then maybe, then no again..... The cop then says your changing your mind about the test,,,,you must be hiding something....

              The cop never proved reasonable su****ion to stop the car in the first place so asking for the test was not warranted.... His changing his mind about the test is of no relavance whatsoever... To undeline this point further,,, the cop could find 100 kilos of crack in your trunk and it would be thrown out of court due to the policeman's illegal stop/search...

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #127
                Originally posted by MayMafia
                Lying about what??? Not wanting to get searched/tested???? You have shyt backwards...

                A cop stops you and accuses you of being drunk with no evidence, no probable cause, reasonable su****ion, nothing.... Then the cop says take this breathalizer test.... You say yes, then no, then maybe, then no again..... The cop then says your changing your mind about the test,,,,you must be hiding something....

                The cop never proved reasonable su****ion to stop the car in the first place so asking for the test was not warranted.... His changing his mind about the test is of no relavance whatsoever... To undeline this point further,,, the cop could find 100 kilos of crack in your trunk and it would be thrown out of court due to the policeman's illegal stop/search...
                First - your example doesn't require a search warrant. I suggest you go back and do some research. Second, your first sentence is wrong as well. I think we should halt this discussion until you know what you're talking about.

                Comment

                • Kingstan315
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 251
                  • 3
                  • 1
                  • 6,311

                  #128
                  Originally posted by MayMafia
                  False, ****** Matlock...

                  For arrests and warrants, probable cause is needed which "information sufficient to warrant a prudent person's belief that the wanted individual had committed a crime (for an arrest warrant)"...

                  Refusing to be searched, is not reasonable su****ion...
                  Man, the ****** must be on the come up... Brothas gettin' credit for frustrating the forum with intelligent banter.

                  here is my question. If you have evidence to arrest why would you need a search warrant???

                  Comment

                  • Pacquiao'd
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 11948
                    • 612
                    • 153
                    • 12,591

                    #129
                    Originally posted by Kingstan315
                    Man, the ****** must be on the come up... Brothas gettin' credit for frustrating the forum with intelligent banter.

                    here is my question. If you have evidence to arrest why would you need a search warrant???

                    this wasnt the question nor statement previously made
                    Last edited by Pacquiao'd; 06-24-2010, 09:52 AM.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #130
                      Originally posted by alexpz
                      Really now your an expert in LAW too? So when has Manny lied? I don't remember do you?
                      Sure. But first things first, Alex. Show proof that a member of Team Mayweather said 60-40. I mean, YOU aren't lying, are you?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP