Originally posted by switchsouthpaw
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Rejects Bigger Revenue Split For Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Sugar Q View PostWe will never know how Manny got that cover but I do know that publicist are paid to get covers by any means and I also know what major magazines charge and I don't see a reason for a magazine like TIME going after Manny though I could be wrong. I'm sure the magazine with Manny didn't post big numbers or we would've heard about it but they certainly didnt pay him to be on the cover.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yesir View Postno you dumbass, pac took a recently vacant belt from cotto.
cotto lost his WW champ belt and lineal title to Marg who lost to shane and shane got whooped up on by floyd.
floyds the lineal champ of the WW division, took shanes belt then threw it back in his face tell him he could keep that POS. that belt manny has is a paperweight. nor will it be apart of negotiations which should tell you it has no value
Cotto defended it vs. Clottey. It's no longer vacant.
Manny beat Cotto, the Cotto that beat Shane, the Shane that beat the lineal champ Marg.
Man with belt = champion
Man with no belt = challenger
You understand yet?
Comment
-
Originally posted by LeadUppercut View PostI think that we should just relax, sit back, and see what happens here.
Let's not be too hard on Manny at this stage, or on Mayweather for that matter, it just sounds like the first offer/counter-offer.
If Mayweather wants 55%, which is what I believe, then of course he will start at 60-40. And no way should Manny accept that.
I might be wrong here.....
but this negotiation looks to be heading in the right direction, I am actually very confident that this fight will happen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostLol they weren't paid for the cover, his story just happens to be interesting and compelling to some. The better question to ask is, why would Time, S.I. and 60 minutes run a feature on an international sports figure, rather than the supposed best boxer on the planet?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sugar Q View PostWell my dude enough said cause your officially an a**hole. You would boycott Floyd for fighting Martinez or Williams but you wouldn't boycott Manny for Cheato or Cotto 2? Goes to show that you have other issues other than boxing. You should get some help for that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by whirlwind View PostFunny all this *****s **** wanted Pac vs OST before instead of Pac vs Floyd. Now after Pac beat to death Floyd invented useless OST. Now they wanted Pac vs money split instead of Pac vs Floyd again. Again?
50/50 sounds fair.. I just want the fight made, I could give a **** if pac takes less..
Comment
-
Originally posted by T.I. View PostLOL!
Cotto defended it vs. Clottey. It's no longer vacant.
Manny beat Cotto, the Cotto that beat Shane, the Shane that beat the lineal champ Marg.
Man with belt = champion
Man with no belt = challenger
You understand yet?
Comment
Comment