considering i'm already paying 60 ****in' dollars, another buck wouldn't hurt. & since i'm a fan of the sport of boxing and think that boxers should be protected from an unfair advantage that could end their career, or much worse, their lives i have np.
Would you pay $1 (ONE DOLLAR) extra on PPV's to cover drug testing?
Collapse
-
-
man, u have a nice argument here. too bad those in favor of paying extra dollars, didnt notice or probly has no response to this one.Is just a dollar I don't care.
I mean why not keep keep the PPV lets say 49.99 or 54.99 like it usually is. Have them take a dollar off that so basically we paying 48.99 or 53.99. I mean what is the difference.
Is that what he is saying of doing? Or is he saying that we have to pay 50.99 and 55.99. I mean how greedy does these mofo's want to get?
And, would it be OST for the main even only or for the whole card? I mean if we going to pay extra even if it is a dollar everybody should get OST even the non televised undercard. Fucking greedy bastards.Comment
-
-
Only thing wrong with that is, they wouldnt have that 1.4 million to distribute as they please. But I get what youre saying, its a good idea, you would think someone in boxing would have thought of it, but greed blinds and they could care less if the fighters are doping anyway, well all except Floyd, the groundbreaker.Interview with Travis Tygart:
Who's supposed to pay for these tests?
The money's there. It's just a matter of priorities. Let's take the Mayweather/Mosley fight. They did 1.4 million PPVs. Adding a $1 dollar 'integrity and sport contribution' onto the PPV fee, could've generated 1.4 million dollars. That's enough money to effectively run an anti-doping program for 5 years. And that's just from 1 PPV.
Here's another option. If you catch fighters cheating, they get fined and suspended, use those fines to pay for anti-doping.Comment
Comment