LOL -Floyd mayweather Owned Hard By Ring TV

[odogg8121]

*****s where are you?

Do you have a job? Or do you wake up day after day trying to figure out how your going to hate and down a person that doesn't even know you exist...just wondering.


If you do have a job you should put in more hours...you have to much time on your hands lol

[HyperUppercut]

many people are show generational bias. They act like just because you are in the past that you are a God, however, most of you mu****as don't know enough about past fighters to even make this assumption . I don't see anything wrong with him saying this and I understand where he is coming from. If I dedicate my life to something, I am gonna say I am the best too and not give a shyt about what other people believe, because they didn't walk in my shoes. But from an non pro boxer standpoint, I think mayweather's timing and defensive are unlike anything that I have ever seen in another fighter.

[GOAT86]

Sorry to say, but Floyd's def is pure legendary material. SRR and Clay/Ali got dented several times, although we saw that they could tehk a poonch. PBF's technique is pure eye-candy.

[Levcon8686]

these are terrible arguments, though i dont agree with mayweather

the simple answer is

Sugar Ray Robinson was greater because he was more prolific, he fought over a 100 fights without losing, and over 140 in his career,

Ali was the second greatest because he had the character and charisma to match his talent, he was a heavyweight boxer which is naturally a larger draw, but he boxed like a smaller man, using alot of movement and footwork


most importantly he was a likeable guy and commanded much more respect


As far as skill goes, neither of them really have anything definitively on mayweather, its a matter of opinion

Ive been saying this for a while Mayweather is certainly not the greatest boxer, but he probably could be the best boxer

This. Ray Robinson and Ali were great, great men. But from a boxing purist standpoint, Floyd is every bit as good as them. He really doesn't care about the 'greatness' anyway from the looks of things.

The 'He couldn't be the greatest cos SRR fought 200 fights' argument is pretty weak if you ask me. Does anyone really want to see Floyd fight 200 times? Do people realise that would entail fighting a bunch of mismatchs just to pad his record?

[rommel357]

Floyd is probably the best defensive boxer ever, this i would give credit to Floyd. But the best boxer overall or the greatest boxer, he is not, not even close.

[Jim Jeffries]

How did Floyd get owned by someone who's never wore a jock strap in their whole life?

[project xxx1]

Mayweather better than Ali and Robinson? Ha

Posted Apr. 23, 2010 at 11:38pm
By Michael Rosenthal


When Muhammad Ali said he was The Greatest, you tended to believe him. When Floyd Mayweather Jr. says the same thing, well …

Mayweather was asked on a conference call a few days ago whether he actually believes what he has said in the past, that he’s a better fighter than were both heavyweight legend Ali and the consensus greatest-ever Sugar Ray Robinson.

He answered in the affirmative.

“Why not?,” he said. “I take my hat off to them. I got respect for Sugar Ray Robinson. I've got respect for Muhammad Ali. But I'm a man just like they're men. I put on my pants just like they put on their pants. What makes them any better than I am? Because they fought a thousand fights? In my era, it's totally different. You know? It's pay-per-view now, so things change. It's out with the old and in with the new. Things change. Like I said, Muhammad Ali is one hell of a fighter. But Floyd Mayweather is the best. Sugar Ray Robinson is one hell of a fighter, but Floyd Mayweather is the best.”

Here’s a quick why not:

Robinson could do everything Mayweather can – and much more. He had power and wasn’t afraid to use it, as Mayweather seems to be. Robinson actually took risks in order to take out his opponents and entertain the fans. And consider this: He started his career 119-1-2 during an era deep in talent and was still fighting for titles into his 40s. Robinson fought 30-plus fights against Hall of Famers.

Ali could do everything Mayweather can – at heavyweight. And, although he wasn’t as aggressive as Robinson was, he too went after his opponents more than Mayweather does. Ali dominating the richest era ever in the heavyweight division, fighting 13 times against hall of famers. And he had charisma that Mayweather couldn’t begin to replicate.

Who has Mayweather beaten? Jose Luis Castillo? Ricky Hatton? An aging Oscar De La Hoya? That doesn't stack against the likes of Jake LaMotta and Kid Gavilan or Sonny Liston and Joe Frazier.

Make no mistake: Mayweather is a future Hall of Famer and one of the best fighters of his time. To compare him to the likes of Ali and Robinson is ridiculous, however. He needs to prove a lot more before we can even entertain such a concept.









^Hey floyd? Instead of sulking, how about learning humility some day:

we get the message mo-ham-head,you dont like floyd,who gives a ***.

thats floyds opinion and a opinion cant be right or wrong,its just a opinion

let it go

[Vadrigar.]

we get the message mo-ham-head,you dont like floyd,who give a ***.

thats floyds opinion and a opinion cant be right or wrong,its just a opinion

let it go

mo-ham-head

I knew it. You had to make a mockery didn't you. You know I can't eat that.

[project xxx1]

mo-ham-head

I knew it. You had to make a mockery didn't you. You know I can't eat that.

chill out with all the hate threads about floyd,i know he talks alot of **** but so do alot of other boxers aswell

[Vadrigar.]

chill out with all the hate threads about floyd,i know he talks alot of **** but so do alot of other boxers aswell

it's just an article from ring magazine. I dressed it up by adding my own thread title and pictures.