The Manny Pacquiao not fighting blackfighter Myth is total bullcrap!!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Big Dunn
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 70654
    • 10,204
    • 8,380
    • 287,568

    #11
    Originally posted by Gordon Gekko
    Indeed. There's really not much difference between ODLH, future potential opponent Antonio Margarito, and Yuri Foreman as far as height is concerned.
    Exactly its the business of boxing and the sport of boxing.

    The sport of boxing dictates Manny should've fought Zahir Raheem when he beat Morales. The businees of boxing dictated Manny fight Morales, a mexican with a huge following for bigger money.

    "Slick boxers" do not generally generate big money in this day and age. Floyd does b/c of his persona. Also, it doesn't make business sense to match any puncher/brawler vs a boxer as they are developing.

    Its not about black or white but green. Some people can't get that!

    Comment

    • infamous larryx
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 10881
      • 512
      • 265
      • 1,565

      #12
      black,white,latino,pinoy..dont matter we all bleed,sweat and dedicate ourselves to the sport..only non boxers say ****** **** like that...when i walk into the gym i dont see color i see men working their ass off

      Comment

      • The Big Dunn
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 70654
        • 10,204
        • 8,380
        • 287,568

        #13
        Originally posted by BoxerDood
        I agree. The only "slick black guy" Pac avoided was Guzman, so people need to shut up about that. Pac would rearrange every last one of them's face aside from maybe Floyd and Guzman (back when both were Super Featherweights) in 2007.
        Then why has top rank not matched them up? I get your point but doesn't that say something that top rank has matched him that way?

        Besides, Joan Guzman is not black(african american) he is dominican.
        Last edited by The Big Dunn; 06-15-2010, 03:12 PM.

        Comment

        • pistol whip
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 8645
          • 255
          • 4
          • 15,040

          #14
          Originally posted by Big Dunn
          Since I posted this in another thread let me respond.

          Top Rank are great matchmakers. Their matchmaker, Bob Goodman (i believe) just got elected to the HOF. Top Rank, not me, not floyd, not pistol whip, not anyone, has chosen not to match Manny against a certain type of fighter. In this case its "slick" boxers.

          As he does, pistol whip exaggerates a point when making a post. No one on this site can say I psoted "Black fighters are the most dominent Boxers in the world is as dumb as saying that white fighters are the best boxers in the world."

          Slick boxers have been a problem for pucnhers/brawlers historically. Yes, in some cases the puncher has won. Duran SRL 1, Chavez Taylor. Instead of ranting in posts, why not question top ranks motives.

          In Manny's case in his last 15 fights he has had the most problems with Morales (when he boxed) and JMM. Again, don't get mad at me for pointing out the truth about how top ranked has matched their top earner. That doesn't make anyone a racist.

          Learn how to read and think!
          First of all Manny is not a ***ing brawler and hes pretty technically proficient when you compare him to Duran and Chavez. He is much faster and has much better footwork than either of those two so I think it's typical that someone with your point of view would label anyone that doesn't fight with their hands down at their waste and running around the ring a brawler.

          What you said was and I quote you from the other thread "Pac has a problem fighting Brothas from the US". You didn't say slick boxers you said "Brothas" so my question again why does skin color need to be pointed out if you arn't trying to say that somehow black boxers are the only fighter good enough to beat Pac?

          Comment

          • The Big Dunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 70654
            • 10,204
            • 8,380
            • 287,568

            #15
            Originally posted by pistol whip
            First of all Manny is not a ***ing brawler and hes pretty technically proficient when you compare him to Duran and Chavez. He is much faster and has much better footwork than either of those two so I think it's typical that someone with your point of view would label anyone that doesn't fight with their hands down at their waste and running around the ring a brawler.

            What you said was and I quote you from the other thread "Pac has a problem fighting Brothas from the US". You didn't say slick boxers you said "Brothas" so my question again why does skin color need to be pointed out if you arn't trying to say that somehow black boxers are the only fighter good enough to beat Pac?
            I said punchers/brawlers.

            Also in the other thread I posted "manny aint fighting too many brothas from the US" as part of saying Manny's options are limited because top rank doesn't match him against a certain type of fighter.after I listed bradley, alexander, zab. The post was in response to the question who had more options if the may vs pac fight didn't happen.

            Instead of reading the whole context you jumped in and over exaggerated my point out of context. That is your style on this board.

            Now that you understand my post and its context was it correct or not? Better yet was it racist? You don't even have to say sorry big dunn I was wrong.

            Comment

            • The Big Dunn
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 70654
              • 10,204
              • 8,380
              • 287,568

              #16
              Originally posted by Big Dunn
              I said punchers/brawlers.

              Also in the other thread I posted "manny aint fighting too many brothas from the US" as part of saying Manny's options are limited because top rank doesn't match him against a certain type of fighter.after I listed bradley, alexander, zab. The post was in response to the question who had more options if the may vs pac fight didn't happen.

              Instead of reading the whole context you jumped in and over exaggerated my point out of context. That is your style on this board.

              Now that you understand my post and its context was it correct or not? Better yet was it racist? You don't even have to say sorry big dunn I was wrong.
              I also posted like what BHOop said to kelly Pavlik. You left that out too. Maybe had you read that you would understand the point. I never said they are the only ones who can beat Pac. It wasn't about winning or losing. It was about money generating fights.

              Do you have any reasons why top rank has not matched manny against african american boxers?

              Comment

              • Left Hook Tua
                VATNIK
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 62306
                • 7,010
                • 1,581
                • 951,318

                #17
                Originally posted by Gordon Gekko
                OFT. This is why Pacquiao stayed away from Yuri Foremn. I'm sure looking back on it now they feel downright foolish but on paper it was a bad style matchup for Pacquiao.
                it wasn't that.

                pacquiao was misquoted.

                most people just read the part where manny said "yuri too big" and "yuri like to move"


                when pacquiao said that what he was trying to say that it wouldn't be entertaining. that yuri would move and use his size and it would be boring to the fans.

                it had nothing to do with them thinking yuri could beat him. it was they thought it would be boring.

                oddly enough , that's what happened in the clottey fight.

                a win but boring to the fans.

                Comment

                • Gordon Gekko
                  Banned
                  • May 2010
                  • 625
                  • 56
                  • 0
                  • 803

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                  it wasn't that.

                  pacquiao was misquoted.

                  most people just read the part where manny said "yuri too big" and "yuri like to move"


                  when pacquiao said that what he was trying to say that it wouldn't be entertaining. that yuri would move and use his size and it would be boring to the fans.

                  it had nothing to do with them thinking yuri could beat him. it was they thought it would be boring.

                  oddly enough , that's what happened in the clottey fight.

                  a win but boring to the fans.
                  What does being too big have to do with being boring?

                  Comment

                  • The Big Dunn
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 70654
                    • 10,204
                    • 8,380
                    • 287,568

                    #19
                    Hey Pistol I'm out. But please make sure to send me any response directly so I can respond later. And next time dude check everything on the post. I'm no hater and don't get into all the *****, *******, nuthugger, gay, racist BS.

                    Or ask me straight up! I'll answer any question directly. I'm no punk b!thc.

                    Go Lakers! Peace!

                    Comment

                    • pistol whip
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 8645
                      • 255
                      • 4
                      • 15,040

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Big Dunn
                      I said punchers/brawlers.

                      Also in the other thread I posted "manny aint fighting too many brothas from the US" as part of saying Manny's options are limited because top rank doesn't match him against a certain type of fighter.after I listed bradley, alexander, zab. The post was in response to the question who had more options if the may vs pac fight didn't happen.

                      Instead of reading the whole context you jumped in and over exaggerated my point out of context. That is your style on this board.

                      Now that you understand my post and its context was it correct or not? Better yet was it racist? You don't even have to say sorry big dunn I was wrong.
                      Bradley, Alexander, and Zab Judah arn't being matched up with him because they are 1. Not welterweights and 2.still b level fighters. The fact that you would even mention Zab Judah a fighter so ***ing full of holes makes you wrong to the 10th power. And if Top Rank doesn't match him up against "certin" fighters then why in the hell are they pushing so hard to fight the best Slick Boxer on the planet? Top rank didn't match him up agaisnt slick boxers for all those years because either didn't fight in his weigh classes or they wern't good enough to begin with. Come on man you really think any of the so called slick boxers you mentioned have accomplished a fraction of what Oscar, Cotto, Hatton, Marquez? Seriously trying to argue style over substance is an argument you just can't win.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP