Boxing historian Mike Silver says Mayweather ain't sure

[TheManniePhresh]

first boxing historian bert sugar said that floyd is scared to loss his 0 against pac and now another historian saying that floyd is the one holding this fight and not sure that he could beat pac.. LOL. I don't know why the *****s and floyd fans can't see this.

This historians are *******s.... LOL.

the historians make mistakes vegas does not. vegas odds favor a mayweather decsion victory...

[Left Hook Tua]

the historians make mistakes vegas does not. vegas odds favor a mayweather decsion victory...

vegas odds is all about getting action.

they feel a slight majority of the casual boxing public would bet mayweather. they're probably right.

[fugu]

vegas odds is all about getting action.

they feel a slight majority of the casual boxing public would bet mayweather. they're probably right.

It dont work this way. If a line is off, the professional sportsbettors will correct it.

No one hates free money.

[Left Hook Tua]

It dont work this way. If a line is off, the professional sportsbettors will correct it.

No one hates free money.

wtf are you talking about?

didn't i say they have floyd as a slight favorite?

i just stated why i think that is.

they feel the betting public favors floyd slightly.

what part of what i stated "don't work that way"?

they set the line as to get as much bets on both sides as possible.

that's why when one side gets more money on them than the other , the lines move.

[TheManniePhresh]

i live in vegas. right now at the station casinos the odds favor pacquiao winning without blood tests and mayweather winning easy with blood tests. im not ****ting i think its ****ing funny.

[Left Hook Tua]

i live in vegas. right now at the station casinos the odds favor pacquiao winning without blood tests and mayweather winning easy with blood tests. im not ****ting i think its ****ing funny.

wtf?????

[Carpe Diem]

Criticism is Floyd's biggest weapon, that's what keeps him going.

[fugu]

wtf are you talking about?

didn't i say they have floyd as a slight favorite?

i just stated why i think that is.

they feel the betting public favors floyd slightly.

what part of what i stated "don't work that way"?

they set the line as to get as much bets on both sides as possible.

that's why when one side gets more money on them than the other , the lines move.

Do you understand the difference between a pro sportsbettor and a sportsbook?

Sportsbettors dont set any lines.

[fugu]

i live in vegas. right now at the station casinos the odds favor pacquiao winning without blood tests and mayweather winning easy with blood tests. im not ****ting i think its ****ing funny.

Oh lol.

Which casinos would take such a bet? Examples?

[check hook]

The thing that gets me about these guys is they don't criticise past fighters at all...........i mean if you know the history of this sport (as good as he was and he is the GOAT) SRR acted like more of a petulant child in negotaitions than Manny and Floyd combined...........

these "historians" have short memories.........look at Sugar's pre fight and then post fight analysis of JMM vs PBF.........it's ying and yang, a complete 180.......his ego won't allow him to just admit he got it wrong.......in my view he is no longer relevant.....he is a pompous old fool.........one minute he is saying Pac and Floyd aren't even top 100 ATG....and next time he is asked Pac is in the top 10????

wtf could he have possibly done in that timeframe to leapfrog 90 spots in his mind?????


............senile old fool!!!