Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pic's from weigh in

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by j.one View Post
    He's a better skilled fighter than Margarito and we aren't talking about the confident Cotto here, this version has mental issues and opens up like a whores panties at a rave.
    hmmmmm......... whores panties

    Comment


    • #62
      Cotto s gonna look damn good ............ i think hes respectable power at 154

      Comment


      • #63
        The first thing that has jumped out at me seeing the vids of Cotto training for this fight and now the pictures of the weigh-in is that for the first time I can remember in YEARS, Cotto's legs/calves look ripped and strong instead of like little sticks. Against Jennings, Clottey, and Pacman his calves looked especially small. Tis is the best I can remember him looking from the waist down ever. Anyone else think the same?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Squirt View Post
          why is it that cotto's balls are bigger than his weiner? no ****!
          i'm sure most guys balls hanger lower than their ****s.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by NWO4Life View Post
            The first thing that has jumped out at me seeing the vids of Cotto training for this fight and now the pictures of the weigh-in is that for the first time I can remember in YEARS, Cotto's legs/calves look ripped and strong instead of like little sticks. Against Jennings, Clottey, and Pacman his calves looked especially small. Tis is the best I can remember him looking from the waist down ever. Anyone else think the same?

            Yeah ive always notcied how thin his legs looked, especially his calves..In recent pics though they look thicker and more veiny.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by -Bloody KJ- View Post
              They both look ready to fight, Cotto looks stronger though. Foreman is the one that looks like he came from WW lol. Can't wait to see what happens. Come on Foreman represent NYC
              he does look thinner compared to Cotto now, but you better believe he will rehydrate upwards of 165-172 , Cotto usually rehydrates to 155or so for his weltwerweight bouts, how much higher is he going to go? 160 tops? Cotto will be the smaller guy, making things more difficult is Foreman's reach and height advantage. Still routing for Cotto.

              Comment


              • #67
                War cotto!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Loccy View Post
                  So that's what a non-weight drained Cotto looks like during a weigh in.
                  I hate to do this, but certain sentiments are best copied and pasted than to rewrite it all together....also, excuse me if I'm wrong, I'm assuming you are implying Cotto was weight drained at 147 (maybe just 145) and note, his fight night weight is near 155 pounds, so I'm just a little confused by what you mean, since he is 154 here...?

                  "Cotto is only a half inch taller than Pacquiao, (5'6 1/2 to 5'7 - Boxrec) going up 9 pounds from 145 to 154, damn he must be on steroids! Don't believe that nonsense, that would basically mean Pacquiao, for those who have accused him, are saying if Cotto can go up 9 pounds, while being drained 2 pounds from the 145, then Pacquiao, only being a half inch smaller, can go up 7 pounds (9-2 drained=7) from the 144 he weighed in, so he can legitimately, innocently be atleast 151 pounds...either that or they're both using PEDs....right?"

                  We might as well accuse everybody who goes up in weight...

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    somebodies gotta tell foreman to ditch the hat

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      They both look healthy, Foreman looks like he'll have a considerable size advantage by the time they step into the ring.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP