The difference between Mayweather and Pacquiao...
Collapse
-
-
only Pac's opponent's wife and kid leave when Pac fights
fans and celebrities leave when Floyd fightsComment
-
This is only my second or third post here, and I don't really want to label myself as either a ******* or *****, but a lot of what you posted was not factual.
For example, a fact is:
A judge incorrectly scored Pacquiao/Marquez I, making it a draw, when in fact it should have been a majority decision win, regardless of your opinion, which is what you start relying on towards the end of your post.
Pacquiao won the second fight as well, regardless of opinion. Officially, he's beaten him.
In '99, when Mayweather was fighting a fifteen year veteran with an eleven year age advantage, Pacquiao was stripped of his titles (OBPF and WBC which he won in '97 and '98 respectively) on the scales because he couldn't make weight. He did then go on to get knocked out by a body shot, unable to pay an opponent off by simply ignoring the contracted weight. Something Mayweather has done recently. This is a fact.
Opinions of whether or not a fighter is shot are just that. Opinions. I think clearly you're caught up in the messageboard feud regarding the two fighters in question and are letting your allegiances dictate the stuff you post. Like a lot of people on a lot of boards do.
Personally, I'm a bibliophile, and I just don't like when a person misuses a word. Like you did with "fact(s)".
If that's how *******s feel, then STFU about the first Castillo fight.Comment
-
That's okay, the ref should have either DQ'd Pac or at least docked a point for hitting Marquez when he was down for the third knockdown, so it evens out. Whining about one point on one judge's card after knocking a guy down three times shows that Pac was outclassed for the remaining 11 rounds.
If that's how *******s feel, then STFU about the first Castillo fight.Comment
-
Comment
-
I could find quite a few things, but to start off with, in no way was pac's win vs jmm a robbery. at the very most, one could argue that pac's draw vs marquez could be considered a robberyComment
-
Comment
-
Duh...no ****. I understand the rules, jackass. He should not have only given a warning, he should have deducted a point. Pac was the beneficiary of an officiating error.Comment
-
When Pacquiao got KO'd by a Journeyman in Thailand...
Floyd was defending his WBC 130 lbs title which he won against Genero Hernandez.
When Pacquiao had a draw against Agapito Sanchez, a fighter with 9 losses...The same year Floyd was dominating a Prime Undefeated Diego Corrales who was favoured to beat him and was in the top 5 P4P List.
When Pacquiao was beaten by a past prime Erik Morales, Floyd was dominating his third weight division while being undefeated.
While Pacquiao was given a gift split decision robbery win over Marquez, Floyd retired as the Undefeated, P4P #1, 6 time world champion in 5 different weight classes and 2007 Fighter of the year.
Floyd already beat Hatton and De La Hoya 2 years before Pacquiao...
Everyone knows all the mexican legends Pacquiao fought were past their best and Pacquiao was favoured to beat them with exception of Barrera 1.
Floyd fought the guy Pacquiao ducked in Mosley, I mean Pacquiao fought Clottey (Clottey Who already lost to a damaged by plaster Cotto, Pacquiao dominated this damaged version.) while Mayweather fought the the P4P #3 and #1 Welterweight in Shane Mosley, dominating him.
When its all said and done Floyd is 41-0, P4P King in most peoples opinion and the Combubox king due to being the most accurate boxer in the world. His punch stats are off the roof.
Pacquiao has 51-3, but it should be 50-5 if you think Marquez won the two fights (The guy who got dominated by Mayweather)
If you want to criticise Floyd fighting Marquez at Welterweight, people should do the same when Pacquiao fought Oscar Larios at Super featherweight.
Sorry Floyd you didn't win, maybe this decade if you don't keep ducking.Comment
Comment