The difference between Mayweather and Pacquiao...

[tesla_power]

It seems that you have just reworded a 3 year old video from Mayweather and added more recent events. lolz.

I can't seem to correlate "all mexican legends where past it when pac fought them" while gloating over the domination of floyd over jmm. It is also not that good to compare pac-larios and pbf-jmm... one is marketed as a tuneup and was fought in the philippines just to showcase pac while floyd-jmm was marketed as numero uno for p4p supremacy. I haven't heard yet of any pac fan or ******* that gloats over the larios win. In fact most avoid discussing it because pac did not look good in that fight. Too much showboating IMO almost made pac pay.

[Stigma]

Which part of my post is a lie, can you point that out? I made it based on facts. I am ready to debate with you, just bring out a single thing I said in the initial post that you dont think is true, go on I dare you.

This is only my second or third post here, and I don't really want to label myself as either a ******* or *****, but a lot of what you posted was not factual.

For example, a fact is:

A judge incorrectly scored Pacquiao/Marquez I, making it a draw, when in fact it should have been a majority decision win, regardless of your opinion, which is what you start relying on towards the end of your post.

Pacquiao won the second fight as well, regardless of opinion. Officially, he's beaten him.

In '99, when Mayweather was fighting a fifteen year veteran with an eleven year age advantage, Pacquiao was stripped of his titles (OBPF and WBC which he won in '97 and '98 respectively) on the scales because he couldn't make weight. He did then go on to get knocked out by a body shot, unable to pay an opponent off by simply ignoring the contracted weight. Something Mayweather has done recently. This is a fact.

Opinions of whether or not a fighter is shot are just that. Opinions. I think clearly you're caught up in the messageboard feud regarding the two fighters in question and are letting your allegiances dictate the stuff you post. Like a lot of people on a lot of boards do.

Personally, I'm a bibliophile, and I just don't like when a person misuses a word. Like you did with "fact(s)".

[Left Hook Tua]

when pacquiao was fighting marquez , barrera and morales back to back to back......mayweather was fighting brusseles , gatti , sosa and mitchell.


when pacquiao was fighting marquez , delahoya , hatton........mayweather's throat was fighting ray j and 50 cen'ts ****.

[Versatility]

when pacquiao was fighting marquez , barrera and morales back to back to back......mayweather was fighting brusseles , gatti , sosa and mitchell.


when pacquiao was fighting marquez , delahoya , hatton........mayweather's throat was fighting ray j and 50 cen'ts ****.

you mean when pacquiao was getting a gift against marquez and fighting shot version of morales and barrera while also losing to a past prime morales.

fact is each time morales faced pacquiao he was coming off a loss.

[SkillspayBills]

The difference is Floyd absolutely ******s Pac when they face one on one in Noveber. Anyone who disagrees can PM me for a bet.

[mikelovesfood]

This is only my second or third post here, and I don't really want to label myself as either a ******* or *****, but a lot of what you posted was not factual.

For example, a fact is:

A judge incorrectly scored Pacquiao/Marquez I, making it a draw, when in fact it should have been a majority decision win, regardless of your opinion, which is what you start relying on towards the end of your post.

Pacquiao won the second fight as well, regardless of opinion. Officially, he's beaten him.

In '99, when Mayweather was fighting a fifteen year veteran with an eleven year age advantage, Pacquiao was stripped of his titles (OBPF and WBC which he won in '97 and '98 respectively) on the scales because he couldn't make weight. He did then go on to get knocked out by a body shot, unable to pay an opponent off by simply ignoring the contracted weight. Something Mayweather has done recently. This is a fact.

Opinions of whether or not a fighter is shot are just that. Opinions. I think clearly you're caught up in the messageboard feud regarding the two fighters in question and are letting your allegiances dictate the stuff you post. Like a lot of people on a lot of boards do.

Personally, I'm a bibliophile, and I just don't like when a person misuses a word. Like you did with "fact(s)".

big words....turn me on 8====D

[Left Hook Tua]

you mean when pacquiao was getting a gift against marquez and fighting shot version of morales and barrera while also losing to a past prime morales.

fact is each time morales faced pacquiao he was coming off a loss.

so marquez fights don't count now?

fine castillo doesn't count for floyd.

his 2nd best win.



barrera wasn't shot in 2003 , ******.

[Pacquiao'd]

more ownage...

powned>>>>*******s

[peyk-peyk]

when pacquiao was fighting marquez , barrera and morales back to back to back......mayweather was fighting brusseles , gatti , sosa and mitchell.


when pacquiao was fighting marquez , delahoya , hatton........mayweather's throat was fighting ray j and 50 cen'ts ****.

I bet Mayweather's throat smokes ray j and 50 cents ****s.

[boxasmash]

When Pacquiao was 8 he was trained by bums in a Filipino gym, when Mayweather was 3 he was trained by a boxing family of world champions.