Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floyd's DEFENCE is WAY better than PERNELL WHITTAKERS!!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Floyd will never be recognized and respected the way Pernell has.. Sweet pea took on ALL comers.. DIDNT duck any1 and DOMINATED his big fights.. Mayweather does just enough to get the win.. Pernell would box circles and THROW F uCKING combos. He was silky smooth..

    MOST of the posters here havent seen him fight in his prime.. they might youtube the oscar or tito fight wen he was past it and PUNCHY..

    Pernell beats Mayweather.. PERIOD..
    Hes a southpaw with speed and stamina.. just how zab judah had sucess in the first 4 rounds, whitaker has it the whole fight..

    floyd boys like burner need to watch some of whitakers fights.. plus he was entertaining and a showman..

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by yesir View Post
      cosign.................

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Canadian Kid View Post
        Floyd's defence is way better. The only thing with whittaker is it LOOKS better and is PRETTIER. If you really watch him he gets TAGGED more often than lil floyd.


        Dont get me wrong id rather have pernells defence becuz it looks so dam pretty and it could get you alot of bitches.



        But just saying Floyd's is better BOXING wise



        But if you want the girls ...... pernells is better
        why do you have more than 2,000 in less than a month? you need... help

        Comment


        • #34
          It's Pernell Whitaker day!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Canadian Kid View Post

            Dont get me wrong id rather have pernells defence becuz it looks so dam pretty and it could get you alot of bitches.


            [IMG]http://i461.***********.com/albums/qq332/mangler83/BS/3400.gif[/IMG]

            Comment


            • #36
              Floyd is
              faster than the flash
              holier than the pope
              taller than Wilt
              harder puncher than Shavers
              better defence than Whitaker
              better boxer than Robinson

              blah blah blah




              but he wasn't

              quick comparing because its not so

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by GTL View Post
                Floyd will never be recognized and respected the way Pernell has.. Sweet pea took on ALL comers.. DIDNT duck any1 and DOMINATED his big fights.. Mayweather does just enough to get the win.. Pernell would box circles and THROW F uCKING combos. He was silky smooth..

                MOST of the posters here havent seen him fight in his prime.. they might youtube the oscar or tito fight wen he was past it and PUNCHY..

                Pernell beats Mayweather.. PERIOD..
                Hes a southpaw with speed and stamina.. just how zab judah had sucess in the first 4 rounds, whitaker has it the whole fight..

                floyd boys like burner need to watch some of whitakers fights.. plus he was entertaining and a showman..

                The hell does this have to do with the thread topic?

                Nothing at all.

                Comment


                • #38
                  You know what I hate about topics like this. The people who always want to say no, have no valid reason for it. They just say "no way. [insert fighter's name here] is great and never ducked anyone. He fought everyone."

                  What the fuck does that have to do with anything? It's like, if you don't agree. Make a valid argument on why you don't agree. Don't just say, no. Make a fucking reasonable statement as to why Whitaker's defense is better.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Post
                    You know what I hate about topics like this. The people who always want to say no, have no valid reason for it. They just say "no way. [insert fighter's name here] is great and never ducked anyone. He fought everyone."

                    What the fuck does that have to do with anything? It's like, if you don't agree. Make a valid argument on why you don't agree. Don't just say, no. Make a fucking reasonable statement as to why Whitaker's defense is better.
                    Really good point

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Post
                      You know what I hate about topics like this. The people who always want to say no, have no valid reason for it. They just say "no way. [insert fighter's name here] is great and never ducked anyone. He fought everyone."

                      What the fuck does that have to do with anything? It's like, if you don't agree. Make a valid argument on why you don't agree. Don't just say, no. Make a fucking reasonable statement as to why Whitaker's defense is better.
                      Because, it is pointless to give reason when fans haven't seen [insert fighter] fight before. So all they're going to say is Floyd blah blah blah.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP