Rampage-Rashad is a better fight because both of them are top 10 (arguably top 5) in their division and it's viewed as a 50/50 matchup.
Vitali is fighting a guy who lost to Zuri Lawrence. Even if Vitali knocks him out in the first round I won't be that impressed. I know it's unfair to judge Sosnowski (or any boxer) by their worst performance, but what exactly is his best performance? It just isn't a good fight IMO.
The Vasquez fight could be entertaining, but it seems more like the kind of fight that would be a good undercard scrap rather than a main event.
Rashad has the style to make things boring, but his questionable chin and Rampage's power mean that the momentum could change at any time so that keeps things interesting.
Vitali is fighting a guy who lost to Zuri Lawrence. Even if Vitali knocks him out in the first round I won't be that impressed. I know it's unfair to judge Sosnowski (or any boxer) by their worst performance, but what exactly is his best performance? It just isn't a good fight IMO.
The Vasquez fight could be entertaining, but it seems more like the kind of fight that would be a good undercard scrap rather than a main event.
Rashad has the style to make things boring, but his questionable chin and Rampage's power mean that the momentum could change at any time so that keeps things interesting.
I'd rather watch two winos going at it over the last drop of Thunderbird than watch that cage crap 

Comment