Nationalism is okay (only when its non-white)

[SkillspayBills]

What Malcolm X said in this speech 50 years ago was true for black people then and is true for white people today:



We are going downhill fast, we need a white Malcolm X to lead us in a better direction.

This is why you get the reputation you have. I don't believe you are a racist, but you are damn near close to, or have already passed, the line of being a white supremacist.

[BOLLOCKS]

We are going downhill fast, we need a white Malcolm X to lead us in a better direction.

Wasn't he a black supremacist ?

[Dan...]

This is why you get the reputation you have. I don't believe you are a racist, but you are damn near close to, or have already passed, the line of being a white supremacist.

LOL. How can someone not be a racist yet have possibly crossed the line of being a white supremacist? That doesn't make any sense.

[βetamax]

White is not a nationality, ethnicity, or a religion. It is a skin color that gives power and privilege. The category "white" serves no other purpose.

Think about this - if whites are a ruling class of people, what is the purpose in being "pro-white" other then to maintain the subjugation of non-white people? That's why being pro-black, Asian, etc. is different. It's about being supportive in rising up to racism in order to collapse the system, not reverse is which is what a lot of people confuse. We're talking about the difference between assertions of racism and reactions to racism. If a non-white person is showing hostility toward a white person in part because of race, that's a reaction to racism - not racism itself. Prejudice is a more appropriate term. However, it is in no shape or form equal to a white person showing hostility to a non-white person in part because of race since there is power behind such actions. It's the difference between hitting someone with a wiffle bat vs a wooden bat.

I think most people subconsciously understand this which is why red-flags go up when you hear people acting in a pro-white manner but don't know how to explain it. It's the same reason people say "reverse-racism" because subconsciously they understand that the flow of racism is from white down otherwise they wouldn't need to add a "reverse" to the beginning.

Think about it: has anyone ever seen someone who is pro-white and not be racist? The fact that they are only concerned with supporting those who need the least racial support tells you all you need to know about those characters.

Now go ahead...

[IMG]http://i677.***********.com/albums/vv138/Kairouseki/3050354749_8d2ce85f29_o.gif[/IMG]

[peekabooboxing]

hopkins was racist too

[Check]

As a white, I will never root for a white boxer. They are just too boring to watch. Katsidis is the only one that comes to mind that I somewhat enjoy.

[peekabooboxing]

wasnt ali half white ????

[Dan...]

As a white, I will never root for a white boxer. They are just too boring to watch. Katsidis is the only one that comes to mind that I somewhat enjoy.

Anyone that doesn't enjoy watching Katsidis fight needs their head checked.

[Forza]

wasnt ali half white ????

nah like 15% irish

[$Bullsfam$]

Why the **** is the world "racism" even being thrown around on a boxing forum? So fn ******. The world as a whole is a mixed culture now. I thought we got over all this **** 50 years ago in the 60's. Anybody calling anybody a racist now for liking fighters is an idiot.

Racism is so fn ****** and should be banned in the world. Nobody is better at anything then anybody. It's the hard work that counts. **** racism and the idiots that still want to throw that word around. It's a dead issue.